Galaxy Watch8 Classic vs Apple Watch Series 9: A Detailed Comparison

The smartwatch landscape is dominated by Apple and Samsung, and their latest offerings – the Galaxy Watch8 Classic and Apple Watch Series 9 – represent the pinnacle of wearable technology. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on performance, battery life, and the ecosystems they inhabit, to determine which smartwatch delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem, the Apple Watch Series 9 remains the superior choice due to its seamless integration and optimized software. However, the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic offers a compelling alternative with its potentially more efficient 3nm Exynos W1000 chipset and wider compatibility, making it the better option for Android users and those prioritizing open platform flexibility.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic Apple Watch Series 9
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China, HK
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 40, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International, China, HK
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, July 092023, September 12
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, July 25Available. Released 2023, September 22
Body
BuildGlass front (Sapphire crystal), stainless steel frameSapphire crystal front, ceramic/sapphire crystal back, stainless steel frame
Dimensions46.4 x 46 x 10.6 mm (1.83 x 1.81 x 0.42 in)45 x 38 x 10.7 mm (1.77 x 1.50 x 0.42 in)
SIMeSIMeSIM
Weight63.5 g (2.26 oz)42.3 g (41mm), 51.5 g (45mm) (1.48 oz)
Display
ProtectionSapphire crystalSapphire crystal glass
Resolution438 x 438 pixels (~327 ppi density)484 x 396 pixels (~326 ppi density)
Size1.34 inches1.9 inches
TypeSuper AMOLED, 3000 nits (peak)Retina LTPO OLED, 2000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUPenta-coreDual-core
ChipsetExynos W1000 (3 nm)Apple S9
GPUMali-G68PowerVR
OSAndroid Wear OS 6, One UI 8 WatchwatchOS 10, upgradable to watchOS 26.1
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal64GB 2GB RAM64GB
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBNoNo
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, altimeter, compass, SpO2, temperature (skin), BioActive, antioxidant indexAccelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, always-on altimeter, compass, SpO2, VO2max, temperature (body)
Battery
Charging10W wirelessWireless, 0-80% in 45 min
TypeLi-Ion 445 mAhLi-Ion 308 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, WhiteGraphite, Silver, Gold, Red
ModelsSM-L500, SM-L505UA2982, A2984, A2983, A2985, Watch7,3, Watch7,4
Price€ 279.90 / $ 299.99About 630 EUR
SAR1.04 W/kg (head)     0.41 W/kg (body)1.02 W/kg (head)
SAR EU0.03 W/kg (head)     0.67 W/kg (body)0.64 W/kg (head)

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic

  • Potentially better power efficiency with the 3nm Exynos W1000 chipset.
  • Rotating bezel provides a unique and intuitive navigation experience.
  • Wider smartphone compatibility (Android and iOS).

  • 10W wireless charging is slower than the Apple Watch Series 9.
  • Wear OS ecosystem, while improving, is still less mature than watchOS.

Apple Watch Series 9

  • Faster charging (0-80% in 45 minutes).
  • Seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem.
  • Mature and refined watchOS operating system.

  • Limited to Apple device compatibility.
  • Dual-core processor may struggle with demanding multitasking compared to the penta-core Exynos.

Display Comparison

While specific display specs aren't provided, both watches utilize advanced AMOLED panels. The Galaxy Watch8 Classic likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering vibrant colors and high peak brightness. However, Apple’s consistently excellent color accuracy and LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates are strong contenders. The Classic’s rotating bezel offers a unique interaction method absent on the Series 9, potentially enhancing usability for some users.

Camera Comparison

Neither watch is focused on photography, and detailed camera specs are absent. Both likely feature basic front-facing cameras for video calls, but image quality is not a primary selling point. The focus is on health tracking and notifications, not capturing high-resolution photos.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: Samsung’s penta-core Exynos W1000, fabricated on a 3nm process, versus Apple’s dual-core S9. While core count isn’t everything, the 3nm node of the Exynos suggests superior power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance compared to Apple’s S9. The Exynos’ architecture is likely optimized for Wear OS, while the S9 is tailored for watchOS. The impact of the dual-core vs. penta-core design will be most noticeable in complex tasks and multitasking, where the Exynos may have an advantage. However, Apple’s tight software-hardware integration often mitigates the raw power difference.

Battery Life

Samsung specifies 10W wireless charging for the Galaxy Watch8 Classic, while Apple claims 0-80% charge in 45 minutes for the Series 9. The faster charging speed of the Apple Watch is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their device. However, the Exynos W1000’s 3nm process could translate to improved battery efficiency, potentially offsetting the slower charging speed with longer real-world usage. Actual battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns and enabled features.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic if you need broader smartphone compatibility (Android and iOS), prefer a rotating bezel for intuitive navigation, and value the flexibility of the Wear OS platform. Buy the Apple Watch Series 9 if you prioritize seamless integration with other Apple devices, a mature and refined operating system (watchOS), and access to Apple’s extensive app ecosystem. The choice hinges on your existing tech investments and preferred operating system.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos W1000 chip in the Galaxy Watch8 Classic overheat during intensive tasks like GPS tracking or workout recording?
The 3nm fabrication process of the Exynos W1000 is designed to improve thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of overheating. While demanding tasks will naturally generate heat, the 3nm node should allow for better sustained performance without significant throttling compared to older chipsets.
❓ How does the Wear OS experience on the Galaxy Watch8 Classic compare to watchOS in terms of app availability and usability?
watchOS boasts a more mature app ecosystem with a wider selection of dedicated smartwatch applications. However, Wear OS has significantly improved with Google’s recent updates, offering access to Google Play Store and a growing number of apps. Usability is subjective, but Wear OS provides greater customization options and a more open platform.
❓ Is the faster charging speed of the Apple Watch Series 9 a significant advantage for everyday use?
For users who frequently forget to charge their watch or need a quick top-up before a workout, the 0-80% charge in 45 minutes offered by the Apple Watch Series 9 is a substantial benefit. It minimizes downtime and ensures the watch is ready when needed.