The Android tablet market is heating up, with Samsung and Xiaomi delivering compelling options at the high end. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra, powered by the cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, aims for uncompromising performance. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro leverages the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, focusing on a balance of power and efficiency. This comparison dissects these tablets to determine which best suits demanding users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and long-term battery health, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset and 1200 charge cycles offer a performance edge and greater longevity, despite the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 04 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 04 | Available. Released 2023, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 326.3 x 208.5 x 5.1 mm (12.85 x 8.21 x 0.20 in) | 254 x 165.2 x 6.5 mm (10.0 x 6.50 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 692 g or 695 g (1.53 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1848 x 2960 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1800 x 2880 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~309 ppi density) |
| Size | 14.6 inches, 617.8 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 1 hour |
| Type | Li-Po 11600 mAh | Li-Po 8600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Gray, Platinum Silver | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | SM-X930, SM-X936B, SM-X936N, SM-X930N | 23046RP50C |
| Price | $ 999.99 | About 330 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 94:51h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 9400+
- Exceptional battery longevity with 1200 charge cycles
- Potentially better image processing due to advanced ISP
- Slower charging speed (45W) compared to Xiaomi
- Likely higher price point
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Potentially more affordable price
- Lower battery cycle count compared to Samsung
- Less powerful chipset than the Dimensity 9400+
Display Comparison
While display specs are missing, both tablets likely feature high-resolution LCD or AMOLED panels. However, the chipset differences suggest differing display capabilities. The Dimensity 9400+’s advanced ISP could enable superior color calibration and HDR processing on the Tab S11 Ultra. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro, benefiting from Qualcomm’s display engine, will likely offer excellent color accuracy and brightness. The absence of LTPO information means we can't assess adaptive refresh rate efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but given the tablet form factor, image quality is less critical than on smartphones. Both devices likely feature multi-camera setups, but the focus will be on video conferencing and document scanning. The Dimensity 9400+'s advanced ISP could provide better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions, but without sensor specifications, a definitive comparison is impossible. We anticipate both tablets will offer acceptable, but not exceptional, camera performance.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) boasts a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. This configuration, built on a 3nm process, promises significant performance and efficiency gains over the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, with its Cortex-X2 prime core at 3.19 GHz, is still a potent performer, but the newer architecture and smaller node of the Dimensity 9400+ should translate to faster processing speeds and improved thermal management, especially during sustained workloads. The Tab S11 Ultra is likely to exhibit less throttling under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra’s 94:51h endurance score and 13:25h active use time demonstrate impressive battery life. Crucially, it also supports 1200 battery cycles, indicating exceptional longevity. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro counters with a significantly faster 67W charging, achieving a full charge in just one hour. While the Tab S11 Ultra’s 45W charging is respectable, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s speed is a major convenience factor. However, the Tab S11 Ultra’s superior endurance and cycle count suggest it will maintain a higher capacity over the device’s lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra if you need the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or intensive gaming, and value a battery designed to last for years. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro if you prioritize rapid charging – reaching 100% in just one hour – and a more affordable price point without sacrificing significant performance for everyday use and lighter workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ in the Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9400+'s 3nm process and advanced thermal management features are designed to mitigate overheating. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Tab S11 Ultra is expected to maintain stable performance for longer periods compared to devices with less efficient chipsets. The larger surface area of the tablet also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro compare to typical tablet charging speeds?
67W charging is exceptionally fast for a tablet. Most tablets charge at 20-45W. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s 67W charging allows it to reach 100% capacity in approximately one hour, significantly reducing downtime and making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Will the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro's battery health degrade significantly faster than the Samsung Tab S11 Ultra's due to the faster charging?
Faster charging *can* contribute to faster battery degradation over the long term, but modern charging algorithms mitigate this effect. However, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra’s 1200 charge cycle rating indicates a battery designed for exceptional longevity, offering a clear advantage in long-term battery health.
