The Android tablet landscape is heating up. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra arrives as a performance powerhouse, leveraging the latest Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset. Meanwhile, Google’s Pixel Tablet offers a unique blend of smart home integration and Google’s Tensor G2 AI capabilities. This comparison dissects the core differences to help you choose the right tablet for your workflow and entertainment.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and extended battery life, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 85:18h endurance significantly outperform the Pixel Tablet. However, the Pixel Tablet’s integration with the Google ecosystem and lower price point make it a compelling option for casual users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | N/A |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 26 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, June 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 326.4 x 208.6 x 5.4 mm (12.85 x 8.21 x 0.21 in) | 258 x 169 x 8.1 mm (10.16 x 6.65 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 718 g (Wi-Fi), 723 g (5G) (1.58 lb) | 493 g (1.09 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1848 x 2960 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~276 ppi density) |
| Size | 14.6 inches, 617.8 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 347.7 cm2 (~79.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide)
12 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO - cellular model only | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2 (Gen 1), magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| | - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11200 mAh | Li-Po 7020 mAh (27 Wh) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Gray, Platinum Silver | Porcelain, Hazel, Rose |
| Models | SM-X920, SM-X926B, SM-X926N, SM-X920N | GA06156-EU, GA06157-EU, GA06158-EU |
| Price | $ 899.99 | About 670 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 85:18h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Long-lasting battery life (85:18h endurance)
- Fast 45W wired charging
- Potentially superior display technology (Super AMOLED, LTPO)
- Likely higher price point
- Camera details currently unknown
Google Pixel Tablet
- Seamless integration with the Google ecosystem
- Potentially more affordable price
- Google’s Tensor G2 AI capabilities
- Compact and portable design
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 9300+
Display Comparison
While display specs are missing for the Tab S10 Ultra, the Pixel Tablet’s 10.95-inch LCD panel is a solid performer. The Tab S10 Ultra, given Samsung’s history, will likely feature a Super AMOLED display with potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The Dimensity 9300+'s powerful GPU will be better utilized by a high-refresh-rate, high-resolution display. The Pixel Tablet’s LCD, while adequate, won’t deliver the same visual punch.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for the Tab S10 Ultra, but Samsung typically equips its tablets with capable camera systems. The Pixel Tablet’s camera specs are also limited, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, could deliver impressive image quality despite potentially smaller sensors. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Samsung’s history suggests a more versatile camera setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) boasts a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – designed for sustained peak performance. This contrasts with the Google Pixel Tablet’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) which utilizes a 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Dimensity 9300+'s newer architecture and higher clock speeds suggest a significant performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9300+ also implies better thermal efficiency compared to the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during prolonged use. The Tab S10 Ultra will likely feature faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra’s 85:18h endurance is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery life. Coupled with its 2000 charge cycles, it promises longevity. The Pixel Tablet’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 15W wired charging is significantly slower than the Tab S10 Ultra’s 45W charging. This means the Tab S10 Ultra will recharge much faster, minimizing downtime. The combination of larger battery capacity (implied by the endurance rating) and faster charging gives the Tab S10 Ultra a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra if you need a tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or mobile gaming, and value long-lasting battery life. Buy the Google Pixel Tablet if you prioritize seamless integration with Google Home, enjoy a more affordable price point, and primarily use your tablet for media consumption and light productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ in the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9300+'s 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While demanding games will inevitably generate heat, the 9300+ is expected to manage temperatures better than the 5nm Tensor G2, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance over extended periods.
❓ How does the Google Tensor G2’s AI capabilities enhance the user experience on the Pixel Tablet beyond typical Android features?
The Tensor G2 excels at on-device machine learning. This translates to features like improved voice recognition, faster image processing, and potentially enhanced smart home integration with Google Assistant. It also enables features like Live Translate and Magic Eraser directly on the tablet.
❓ Given the 15W charging on the Pixel Tablet, how long will it take to fully charge the device from 0%?
Without knowing the battery capacity, it's difficult to provide an exact time. However, 15W charging is relatively slow. Expect a full charge to take between 3-5 hours, depending on the battery size. The Tab S10 Ultra’s 45W charging will significantly reduce this time.
