Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite vs. Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a slightly more refined processor, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite is the better choice. Its Exynos 1380 chipset, coupled with an impressive 87:42 hour endurance rating, provides a more reliable experience, especially for demanding tasks. However, the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 offers a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite | Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 25 | Available. Released 2023, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 254.3 x 165.8 x 6.6 mm (10.01 x 6.53 x 0.26 in) | 269.1 x 169.4 x 7.4 mm (10.59 x 6.67 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 524 g (1.16 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1320 x 2112 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~228 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~203 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.9 inches, 344.5 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.5 inches, 376.4 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 12L |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), AF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass (cellular model only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, 100% in 120 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 8000 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Coral Red | Storm Grey, Sage |
| Models | SM-X400, SM-X406, SM-X406B | TB350FU |
| Price | $ 249.99 | About 350 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 87:42h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
- Superior CPU performance with the Exynos 1380
- Exceptional battery life (87:42 hour endurance)
- Likely better display quality due to Samsung’s expertise
- 5nm fabrication process is older than the P11 Gen 2's 6nm
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Samsung)
Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2
- More modern 6nm chipset fabrication
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Clean Android experience (Lenovo typically avoids heavy skins)
- Inferior CPU performance compared to the Exynos 1380
- Likely shorter battery life
- Less established brand reputation for display quality
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, the Tab S10 Lite benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, likely offering vibrant colors and good viewing angles. The Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2, with its Mediatek Helio G99, doesn’t have the same brand reputation for display quality. The 6nm process of the Helio G99 *could* translate to slightly better power efficiency in display operation, but this is speculative without knowing panel specifics. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy will be a key differentiator where Samsung typically excels.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but given the market segment, neither tablet is expected to excel in photography. The focus should be on video conferencing capabilities. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Samsung’s software typically offering more refined results. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the emphasis should be on front-facing camera quality for video calls.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset features an octa-core configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Exynos 1380’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a performance advantage over the P11 Gen 2’s A76 cores, resulting in snappier responsiveness in demanding applications. The 5nm fabrication of the Exynos also suggests better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Helio G99’s 6nm process is more efficient than older nodes, it doesn’t fully offset the architectural advantage of the Exynos.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite boasts an impressive 87:42 hour endurance rating, a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2. While the P11 Gen 2’s battery capacity is unknown, the S10 Lite’s endurance suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. The S10 Lite supports 25W wired charging, reaching 100% in 120 minutes. The P11 Gen 2’s charging speed is not specified, but a slower charging rate would further solidify the S10 Lite’s advantage for users who prioritize minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite if you need exceptional battery life for extended travel or work, and value the Samsung ecosystem. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask, stream media, or require a tablet that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 if you prioritize a newer chipset fabrication process (6nm vs 5nm) and are looking for a more affordable option, particularly if your usage is primarily focused on casual browsing, video playback, and light productivity.