Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro vs. Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen): A Deep Dive
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing durability, long-term reliability, and consistent performance under stress, the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset and exceptional 142:50h battery endurance outweigh the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus's lower price point for demanding tasks and field work.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66, 68 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 14 | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 07 | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 242.9 x 170.2 x 10.2 mm (9.56 x 6.70 x 0.40 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 680 g or 683 g (1.50 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMCP/uMCP | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, charging/accessories connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10100 mAh, removable | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Models | SM-X356B, SM-X350 | - |
| Price | About 900 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.31 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 142:50h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (142:50h endurance)
- Ruggedized design for durability
- Powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 processor
- Long-term reliability with 2000 charge cycles
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially bulkier design due to ruggedization
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 20W fast charging
- Sleeker, more conventional design
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 680/Helio G80)
- Shorter battery life
- Less durable construction
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the comparison hinges on their intended use. The Tab Active5 Pro prioritizes visibility in bright sunlight, likely with a higher peak brightness, though specific nits are unavailable. The Tab M10 Plus focuses on affordability, potentially sacrificing peak brightness and color accuracy. The Active5 Pro’s display is likely protected by more robust glass, contributing to its ruggedness. Bezels are expected to be larger on the Active5 Pro to accommodate the ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is not a primary focus for either device, but the Active5 Pro likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise. Given the context data doesn't specify sensor sizes, we can assume both tablets feature modest camera setups. The Active5 Pro’s camera is likely optimized for quick documentation in field settings, while the Tab M10 Plus’s camera is geared towards casual snapshots. Any 2MP macro sensors on either device are unlikely to deliver significant image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro’s Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus’s options. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 utilizes a tri-cluster configuration (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) built on a more efficient 4nm process, offering superior multi-core performance and power efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 680 (6nm) or Helio G80 (12nm) found in the Tab M10 Plus. The 4nm node translates to less heat generation under sustained load, minimizing throttling. The Tab M10 Plus’s CPU configurations (Kryo 265 Gold/Silver or Cortex-A75/A55) are older architectures, resulting in lower single-core and multi-core scores. This difference is crucial for demanding applications like CAD software or complex spreadsheets.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro boasts an impressive 142:50h endurance, coupled with a claimed 2000 charge cycles, indicating exceptional longevity. This is likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and optimized software. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus, while offering 20W wired charging, lacks the endurance of the Active5 Pro. The Tab M10 Plus’s battery capacity is not specified, but its less efficient chipset and potentially larger display will likely result in shorter runtimes. The Active5 Pro’s extended battery life and cycle count are critical for users who rely on their tablet throughout the workday without access to frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro if you need a tablet capable of withstanding drops, dust, and extreme temperatures, and require a consistently responsive experience for work applications. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you prefer a more affordable tablet for media consumption, light productivity, and casual gaming, and don't require the specialized rugged features of the Samsung.