Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 vs. Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen): Which Budget Tablet Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 emerges as the better choice. Its more efficient 6nm Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, coupled with a reported 93:40h endurance, provides a significant advantage in battery life and sustained performance over the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus, despite the latter's slightly faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - cellular model only | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - cellular model only | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 12 | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 211 x 124.7 x 8 mm (8.31 x 4.91 x 0.31 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 335 g or 337 g (11.82 oz) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~179 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.7 inches, 214.9 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8, up to 7 major Android upgrades | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMCP/uMCP | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Models | SM-X133, SM-X135, SM-X135F | - |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.29 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 93:40h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- Superior battery life (93:40h endurance)
- More efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Longer battery lifespan (1200 charge cycles)
- Slower charging (15W)
- Display specs are unknown
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- Faster charging (20W)
- LTE connectivity option (Snapdragon variant)
- Potentially larger display size
- Shorter battery life
- Less efficient chipset (especially Helio G80 variant)
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature IPS LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed specs like resolution and peak brightness are missing. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus’s display size is generally larger, which may be preferable for media consumption. Without specific data, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but we can assume both will be adequate for casual use.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are expected to feature basic camera setups. Details are lacking, but it’s safe to assume image quality will be sufficient for casual snapshots and video calls. Focusing on sensor size or aperture is futile without specific data; these cameras are primarily functional, not photographic powerhouses.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Tab A11’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Lenovo’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) or Helio G80 (12nm). The G99’s 6nm process node also contributes to better power efficiency. While the Snapdragon 680 boasts higher clock speeds (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the A76), the architectural improvements in the G99, combined with the smaller node, likely translate to superior sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Wi-Fi only M10 Plus variant with the Helio G80 (12nm) will be noticeably slower and less efficient than either of the other two options.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A11’s reported 93:40h endurance is a major advantage. While the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus offers 20W charging compared to the A11’s 15W, the A11’s superior battery life and chipset efficiency mean it will likely spend less time plugged in. The faster charging on the M10 Plus is beneficial, but it’s less impactful if the battery drains more quickly. The A11 also boasts a reported 1200 charge cycles, suggesting greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 if you prioritize long battery life for extended streaming, reading, or productivity on the go. Its modern chipset offers a smoother experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you specifically need LTE connectivity (on the Snapdragon variant) and value the slightly faster 20W charging, understanding that you may experience shorter battery life and potentially more thermal throttling during demanding tasks.