Samsung Galaxy S7 edge vs. Google Pixel XL: Which 2016 Flagship Still Holds Up?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge emerges as the slightly better choice. Its superior battery endurance (87h vs 78h) and established feature set, including wireless charging, outweigh the Pixel XL’s marginally faster processor and software advantages, especially given both devices are now several generations old.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (USA) | Google Pixel XL |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - G935A, G935P, G935R | - |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G935A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | - | Yes |
| GPRS | - | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps or LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2016, February. Released 2016, March | 2016, October 04. Released 2016, October 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), glass back (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum/glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 150.9 x 72.6 x 7.7 mm (5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 in) | 154.7 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.09 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 157 g (5.54 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 530 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), TouchWiz UI | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | 12.3 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.3", 1.55µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/3.2", 1.4µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio (after SW update; operator dependent) | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless | 18W wired, PD |
| Music play | - | Up to 130 h |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 552 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 32 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3450 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Onyx, Silver Titanium, Gold Platinum, Coral Blue | Quite Black, Very Silver, Really Blue |
| Models | SM-G935A, SM-G935P, SM-G935V, SM-G935T, SM-G935R, SM-G935U, SM-G935L, SAMSUNG-SM-G935A | - |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| SAR | 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.25 W/kg (head) 0.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 78h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.164 (sunlight) |
| Performance | - | Basemark OS II 2.0: 2281Basemark X: 30861 |
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (USA)
- Superior battery life (87h endurance)
- Curved edge display for immersive viewing
- Wireless charging support
- Established feature set and ecosystem
- Samsung’s TouchWiz UI (though improved over previous versions)
- Potential for accidental touches on curved screen
Google Pixel XL
- Clean and fast software experience
- Excellent camera with HDR+ processing
- Faster charging with Power Delivery
- Guaranteed software updates (at launch)
- Shorter battery life (78h endurance)
- No wireless charging support
- Larger bezels compared to S7 edge
Display Comparison
Both the S7 edge and Pixel XL feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio and a 4.164 sunlight contrast ratio, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the S7 edge’s defining feature is its dual-edge curved screen, offering a more immersive visual experience, though potentially prone to accidental touches. While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology, Samsung’s in-house expertise in display manufacturing likely results in slightly more vibrant colors and potentially better color accuracy on the S7 edge. The Pixel XL’s display focuses on color accuracy and clarity, prioritizing a natural look.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel XL’s camera was lauded for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s HDR+ algorithm to produce stunning images with excellent dynamic range. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel XL’s image processing is the key differentiator. The S7 edge, while capable, relies more on hardware and traditional image processing techniques. The Pixel XL’s focus on software allows it to excel in low-light conditions, producing brighter and more detailed images. Both phones offer video recording capabilities, but the Pixel XL’s stabilization and dynamic range likely provide a superior video experience.
Performance
Both devices utilize Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 820/821 chipsets, fabricated on a 14nm process. The Pixel XL boasts the Snapdragon 821, a minor revision of the 820 found in the S7 edge, offering a slight clock speed bump. While benchmarks would show a marginal performance increase for the Pixel XL, the real-world difference is likely negligible for most tasks. Both phones feature the same quad-core CPU configuration (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo). Thermal management is a key consideration; the S7 edge’s larger chassis might offer slightly better heat dissipation, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. However, Google’s software optimization on the Pixel XL could also contribute to efficient performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge holds a significant advantage in battery endurance with an 87-hour rating compared to the Pixel XL’s 78 hours. This translates to a noticeable difference in real-world usage. While the Pixel XL supports 18W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), offering potentially faster charging speeds, the S7 edge supports 15W Quick Charge 2.0 and adds the convenience of wireless charging. The S7 edge’s larger battery capacity and efficient power management give it a clear edge in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (USA) if you prioritize all-day battery life, a visually striking curved display, and established features like wireless charging. Buy the Google Pixel XL if you value a cleaner software experience, faster software updates (though now limited), and a camera known for its excellent dynamic range and image processing, even by today's standards.