Nostalgia for older smartphones is real, and the Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo and S7 Active offer compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. But which of these aging devices still holds up in 2024? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is the clear winner. While the S5 Neo offers affordability, the S7 Active's significantly more powerful Snapdragon 820 chipset, superior camera, and robust build quality make it a more capable and future-proof choice, despite both having excellent battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - G903F | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - G903F | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 29 - G903W | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, August. Released 2015, August | 2016, June. Released 2016, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 142 x 72.5 x 8.1 mm (5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) | 148.8 x 74.9 x 9.9 mm (5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 145 g (5.11 oz) | 184.8 g (6.53 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
MIL-STD-810G compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~576 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.1 inches, 71.7 cm2 (~69.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.1 inches, 71.7 cm2 (~64.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Exynos 7580 Octa (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Adreno 530 |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.9, 31mm (standard), AF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, EDR, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| | ANT+
S-Voice | ANT+
S-Voice natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired, QC2
Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Music play | Up to 73 h | Up to 110 h |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 384 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 15 h (3G) | Up to 32 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2800 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Gold | Camo Green, Titanium Gray, Sandy Gold |
| Models | SM-G903F, SM-G903W, SM-G903M, SM-S903VL | SM-G891A |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.46 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | 0.32 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -94.3dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 72dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 78dB |
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 2487Basemark X: 32362 |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Compact size
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Outdated chipset
- Lower performance
- Less impressive camera
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy S7 active
- Powerful Snapdragon 820 chipset
- Excellent camera with OIS
- Durable build quality
- Good battery life
- Vibrant display
- Older design
- Limited software updates
- May be harder to find in good condition
Display Comparison
The S7 Active boasts a 5.1-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 (QHD), offering a sharper and more vibrant visual experience compared to the S5 Neo's 5.1-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 (FHD). The S7 Active's higher pixel density results in a noticeably clearer image.
Camera Comparison
The S7 Active's camera system is noticeably better. It features a 12MP rear camera with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a faster aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The S5 Neo's 16MP camera is decent, but lacks the same level of image quality and stabilization.
Performance
The Snapdragon 820 in the S7 Active is a substantial upgrade over the Exynos 7580 in the S5 Neo. The S7 Active's quad-core Kryo CPU and Adreno 530 GPU provide significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking, making it better for gaming and demanding applications. The S5 Neo feels sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 96 hours. However, the S7 Active's more efficient chipset and slightly larger battery capacity (4000 mAh vs S5 Neo's 2800 mAh) give it a slight edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo is ideal for users seeking a basic, reliable Android phone on a tight budget, primarily for calls, texts, and light app usage. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is better suited for those needing a durable device with better performance, a superior camera, and longer software support (though limited now).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo still worth buying?
Only if you're on an extremely tight budget and need a basic phone for calls and texts. Otherwise, the S7 Active offers significantly more value.
❓ How durable is the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active?
The S7 Active is built to military standards (MIL-STD-810G) and is water and dust resistant (IP68), making it exceptionally durable.