Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Xiaomi 15 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Elite Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a consistently bright display, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior 43:38h battery endurance and 1449 nits peak brightness outweigh the Xiaomi 15 Pro’s faster charging, making it the more reliable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Xiaomi 15 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 22 | 2024, October 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 03 | Available. Released 2024, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.8 x 7.3 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.29 in) | 161.3 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 213 g or 219 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Shatterproof glass (2024 gen) |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 50 MP, f/1.4, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4900 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black | Black, White, Silver, Green |
| Models | SM-S936B, SM-S936B/DS, SM-S936U, SM-S936U1, SM-S936W, SM-S936N, SM-S9360, SM-S936E, SM-S936E/DS | 24101PNB7C, 2410DPN6CC |
| Price | $ 999.99 / C$ 956.75 / £ 999.00 / € 799.00 | About 690 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.26 W/kg (head) 1.26 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 43:38h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Exceptional battery endurance (43:38h)
- High peak display brightness (1449 nits)
- Long-term battery health (2000 cycles)
- Slower wired charging than Xiaomi 15 Pro
- Potentially less aggressive performance tuning
Xiaomi 15 Pro
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Potentially more aggressive performance profile
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and Xiaomi 15 Pro are expected to feature high-quality displays, but Samsung takes a slight edge with its measured 1449 nits peak brightness. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight, a crucial factor for outdoor users. While Xiaomi’s display specs are currently unknown, Samsung’s history suggests a focus on color accuracy and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to power efficiency. The absence of detailed Xiaomi display information suggests a potential trade-off in peak brightness or color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are missing, but the chipset’s ISP capabilities are shared. The focus will likely be on software processing and lens quality. Given Xiaomi’s history, we anticipate a focus on high megapixel counts and computational photography, while Samsung typically emphasizes natural color reproduction and versatile lens options. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Samsung’s established image processing pipeline often delivers more consistent results across various lighting conditions.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8750-AC/AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm). The CPUs are nearly identical: Octa-core configurations with 2x4.47 GHz (Samsung) vs 2x4.32 GHz (Xiaomi) Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores. The minor clock speed difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday tasks. The real-world performance will hinge on thermal management. While both utilize a 3nm process for improved efficiency, Xiaomi’s aggressive pursuit of peak performance might lead to more throttling under sustained load. Samsung’s optimization typically prioritizes sustained performance over short bursts.
Battery Life
The battery is where the S25+ truly shines. Its 43:38h endurance rating is significantly higher than what we’d expect from the Xiaomi 15 Pro, which lacks a comparable figure. The S25+ also boasts 2000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. While the Xiaomi 15 Pro compensates with blazing-fast 90W wired charging (65% in 30 minutes), compared to the S25+'s 45W (65% in 30 minutes), the S25+'s superior endurance means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently. The 15W (Qi2) vs 50W wireless charging and 4.5W vs 10W reverse wireless charging further highlight the S25+'s focus on overall battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25+ if you need exceptional battery life, a consistently bright and color-accurate display for outdoor use, and a proven track record of software support. Buy the Xiaomi 15 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds, frequently top up your phone throughout the day, and appreciate a more aggressive, potentially faster-feeling charging experience.