Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around excellence and long-term battery health, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ emerges as the winner. Its superior battery endurance, coupled with the refined Oryon CPU architecture, provides a smoother, more reliable experience. However, the vivo X200 Pro mini’s blazing-fast 90W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value speed above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 22 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 03 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.8 x 7.3 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.29 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4900 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | SM-S936B, SM-S936B/DS, SM-S936U, SM-S936U1, SM-S936W, SM-S936N, SM-S9360, SM-S936E, SM-S936E/DS | V2419A |
| Price | $ 999.99 / C$ 956.75 / £ 999.00 / € 799.00 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.26 W/kg (head) 1.26 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 43:38h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Exceptional battery endurance (43:38h)
- Powerful and efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
- Long-term battery health with 2000 charge cycles
- 45W charging is slower than the competition
- Potentially larger form factor
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9400 chipset
- Wireless charging slower than Samsung
- Battery endurance likely lower than S25+
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ boasts a peak brightness of 1449 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo X200 Pro mini’s display specs are currently unknown, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The S25+'s likely use of LTPO technology will contribute to more efficient power consumption, dynamically adjusting the refresh rate. Samsung’s history of color accuracy suggests a more calibrated display experience out of the box, potentially appealing to professionals needing accurate color representation.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo X200 Pro mini, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically focuses on versatile camera systems with strong image processing. The S25+ will likely feature advanced computational photography algorithms and robust video recording capabilities. The Dimensity 9400’s ISP will be crucial for the X200 Pro mini’s image quality, but without knowing sensor sizes and lens apertures, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. We can assume both phones will offer excellent image quality in good lighting conditions, but Samsung’s experience in low-light photography may give it an edge.
Performance
Both devices leverage 3nm fabrication, but employ different architectures. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite with its Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU cores (2x4.47 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz). This architecture, designed in-house by Qualcomm, prioritizes sustained performance and efficiency. The vivo X200 Pro mini, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 9400, features a Cortex-X925 prime core at 3.63 GHz, alongside Cortex-X4 and A720 cores. While the X925 offers peak performance, the Oryon cores in the S25+ are expected to excel in multi-threaded tasks and maintain higher clock speeds for longer durations due to superior thermal management. The S25+'s LPDDR5x RAM will also contribute to faster data access.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ delivers an impressive 43:38h endurance and supports 2000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. Its 45W wired charging, while not the fastest, is complemented by 15W Qi2 wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless. The vivo X200 Pro mini, however, shines with its 90W wired charging, promising significantly faster top-ups. While its wireless charging is limited to 30W, the sheer speed of the wired charging is a major advantage. The S25+'s longer endurance, however, means fewer charging cycles are needed overall, potentially offsetting the convenience of faster charging for some users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25+ if you need a phone that consistently delivers exceptional performance, boasts impressive battery life, and offers a mature software experience. It’s ideal for power users, content creators, and those who demand reliability. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prioritize incredibly fast charging, a more compact design, and are eager to experience the latest Mediatek Dimensity silicon. It’s a great choice for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost and prefer a smaller device.