Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs. Oppo Find X9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and display brightness, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 1449 nit display offer a superior experience for demanding tasks and outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s exceptional 21:57h active use battery life and 80W charging make it the better choice for power users who value longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 22 | 2025, October 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 03 | Available. Released 2025, October 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.8 x 7.3 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.29 in) | 161.3 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 224 g (7.90 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) | 1272 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Arm G1-Ultra |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 16 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama, LUT preview |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 50 MP, f/1.5, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | Panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless | 80W wired, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4900 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black | Silk White, Titanium Charcoal, Velvet Red |
| Models | SM-S936B, SM-S936B/DS, SM-S936U, SM-S936U1, SM-S936W, SM-S936N, SM-S9360, SM-S936E, SM-S936E/DS | CPH2791, PLG110 |
| Price | $ 999.99 / C$ 956.75 / £ 999.00 / € 799.00 | $ 1,184.51 / £ 1,149.00 / ₹ 109,999 |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.26 W/kg (head) 1.26 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 43:38h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Brighter display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Long-term battery health with 2000 charge cycles
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo
Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Exceptional battery life with 21:57h active use
- Ultra-fast 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- More efficient thermal management (likely)
- Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Dimmer display compared to Samsung
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1449 nits, compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s 1175 nits. This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified, but standard for this segment), the S25+’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The lack of PWM frequency data prevents a definitive statement on flicker, but Samsung typically employs higher frequencies, potentially benefiting users sensitive to screen flicker.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on sensor size and image processing. Given Oppo’s history, the Find X9 Pro likely prioritizes computational photography and AI-enhanced image processing. Samsung typically leans towards more natural color reproduction. The absence of information on OIS and lens apertures prevents a deeper analysis, but larger sensors generally perform better in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will feature advanced camera systems, but the specific strengths will depend on software tuning and sensor choices.
Performance
Both phones utilize 3nm chipsets, but their architectures differ significantly. The S25+’s Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite features Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – two ‘Phoenix L’ at 4.47 GHz and six ‘Phoenix M’ at 3.53 GHz – designed for exceptional single-core and multi-core performance. The Find X9 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 9500 employs a more traditional core configuration: 1x 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x 2.7 GHz C1-Pro. While the Dimensity 9500 is powerful, the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon architecture is expected to deliver superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks. The S25+’s LPDDR5x RAM (assumed, given the flagship status) will further contribute to faster application loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X9 Pro demonstrably leads in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 21:57h active use score compared to the S25+’s 14:26h. This suggests a more efficient chipset and/or optimized software. While the S25+ offers a respectable 45W wired charging with 65% charge in 30 minutes, the Find X9 Pro’s 80W wired charging (with UFCS and PPS support) and 50W wireless charging are significantly faster. The Find X9 Pro also supports 10W reverse wireless charging, while the S25+ offers 4.5W. The S25+’s battery is rated for 2000 cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health, but the Find X9 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25+ if you need uncompromising CPU performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and if a vibrant, exceptionally bright display is crucial. Buy the Oppo Find X9 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, incredibly fast charging speeds, and a more balanced thermal profile for sustained performance during extended use.