Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: A Deep Dive into Compact Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S25 emerges as the winner. Its 37:16h endurance and 1395 nits peak brightness provide a significant advantage. However, the vivo X200 Pro mini’s 90W charging is a compelling alternative for those who value rapid replenishment.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 22 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 03 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm (5.78 x 2.78 x 0.28 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 94.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | SM-S931B, SM-S931B/DS, SM-S931U, SM-S931U1, SM-S931W, SM-S931N, SM-S9310, SM-S931E, SM-S931E/DS | V2419A |
| Price | $ 674.99 / C$ 689.00 / £ 435.99 / € 548.13 / ₹ 80,999 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.29 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 37:16h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25
- Exceptional 37:16h battery endurance
- High peak brightness of 1395 nits
- Long battery lifespan (2000 cycles)
- Slower charging speed (25W wired)
- Camera specs currently unknown
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- MediaTek Dimensity 9400 offers strong performance
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Shorter battery endurance compared to S25
- Camera details currently unavailable
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25 boasts a peak brightness of 1395 nits, measured, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X200 Pro mini’s display specs are currently unknown, Samsung’s history suggests a high-quality panel. The S25’s brightness advantage is significant, and the potential for LTPO technology (implied for a flagship) would further enhance efficiency. The S25’s display is geared towards outdoor usability and content consumption, while the X200 Pro mini’s display will likely focus on color accuracy and vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo X200 Pro mini, a direct comparison is limited. However, vivo typically prioritizes camera performance, and we can expect a capable system. The S25’s camera system (specs missing) will likely focus on computational photography and image stabilization. The X200 Pro mini’s image processing style will likely lean towards vibrant colors and detail enhancement, typical of vivo’s approach. The absence of information on sensor sizes prevents a definitive assessment, but larger sensors generally translate to better low-light performance.
Performance
Both devices utilize 3nm chipsets, but the architectures differ significantly. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features the Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – a custom design focused on sustained performance. The vivo X200 Pro mini employs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, utilizing a Cortex-X925 prime core alongside Cortex-X4 and A720 cores. The Snapdragon’s Oryon cores, particularly the larger Phoenix L cores at 4.47 GHz, suggest a potential edge in single-core performance and demanding tasks. However, the Dimensity 9400’s architecture is optimized for efficiency and multi-core workloads. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon’s architecture, while powerful, may generate more heat under sustained load. The S25’s LPDDR5x RAM (assumed) will complement the Snapdragon’s performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S25’s 37:16h endurance is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery life. This is coupled with a 2000-cycle battery lifespan, promising longevity. The X200 Pro mini compensates with its 90W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in under 30 minutes. While the S25 offers 25W wired and 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) charging, the X200 Pro mini’s charging speed is significantly faster. The S25’s 4.5W reverse wireless charging adds convenience, while the X200 Pro mini offers reverse *wired* charging, a less common feature. The S25 prioritizes longevity and sustained use, while the X200 Pro mini focuses on minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 if you need a phone that will comfortably last a full day and beyond, and if you frequently use your phone outdoors where a bright display is crucial. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to trade some battery endurance for that convenience. The X200 Pro mini also appeals to users who prefer MediaTek’s processing style.