Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Oppo Find X9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S25 is the winner. However, the Oppo Find X9 Pro delivers significantly longer active use battery life and dramatically faster charging, making it ideal for power users who demand all-day endurance and minimal downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 22 | 2025, October 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 03 | Available. Released 2025, October 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm (5.78 x 2.78 x 0.28 in) | 161.3 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 224 g (7.90 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1272 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 94.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Arm G1-Ultra |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 16 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama, LUT preview |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 50 MP, f/1.5, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | Panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless | 80W wired, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black | Silk White, Titanium Charcoal, Velvet Red |
| Models | SM-S931B, SM-S931B/DS, SM-S931U, SM-S931U1, SM-S931W, SM-S931N, SM-S9310, SM-S931E, SM-S931E/DS | CPH2791, PLG110 |
| Price | $ 674.99 / C$ 689.00 / £ 435.99 / € 548.13 / ₹ 80,999 | $ 1,184.51 / £ 1,149.00 / ₹ 109,999 |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.29 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 37:16h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite and Oryon cores
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Qi2 wireless charging support
- Significantly shorter active use battery life
- Slower charging speeds (25W wired)
Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Exceptional battery life with 21:57h active use score
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging (UFCS, PPS)
- Faster 50W wireless charging
- Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Dimmer display compared to the Samsung Galaxy S25
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1395 nits, compared to the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s 1175 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data), the S25’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for HDR content consumption. The lack of specific panel technology details prevents a deeper analysis of color accuracy and viewing angles, but Samsung historically excels in these areas.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specific camera details, making a comprehensive comparison impossible. However, given the flagship positioning, both phones will likely feature advanced camera systems. Oppo historically focuses on computational photography and natural-looking images, while Samsung tends towards more vibrant and saturated colors. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, it’s difficult to determine a clear winner. We can assume both will offer excellent image quality, but the processing style will likely be the key differentiator.
Performance
Both devices leverage a 3nm process, but employ different chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features the Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite with a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU configuration (2x4.47 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz). This architecture, designed by Qualcomm, is expected to deliver exceptional single-core and multi-core performance. The Oppo Find X9 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9500, featuring a tri-cluster configuration (1x4.21 GHz + 3x3.5 GHz + 4x2.7 GHz). While the Dimensity 9500 is a powerful chip, the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon cores are likely to provide a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads. The S25’s LPDDR5x RAM speed is also likely higher, further contributing to its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 21:57h versus the S25’s 13:09h. While the S25 offers a respectable 37:16h endurance, this is likely due to optimized power management rather than raw capacity. The Find X9 Pro’s advantage is further amplified by its superior charging capabilities: 80W wired (with UFCS and PPS support) versus the S25’s 25W. This means the Find X9 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. The S25’s 50% charge in 30 minutes is adequate, but pales in comparison to the Find X9 Pro’s potential for a full charge in under 30 minutes. The 50W wireless charging on the Oppo also surpasses the S25’s 15W Qi2 wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 if you need the absolute fastest CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value a display that excels in direct sunlight. Buy the Oppo Find X9 Pro if you prioritize battery life, need the convenience of incredibly fast 80W charging, and frequently use your phone throughout the day without access to a power outlet.