Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ and 120W charging significantly outperform the S25 FE. However, the S25 FE’s longer battery endurance (42:37h) and Qi2 wireless charging make it a compelling choice for those valuing longevity and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 04 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 04 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.6 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC2, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless, Qi2 compatible Reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 4900 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | SM-S731B, SM-S731B/DS | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | $ 474.99 / C$ 664.75 / € 493.00 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 42:37h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Exceptional battery endurance (42:37h)
- Qi2 wireless charging compatibility
- Slightly brighter display (1247 nits)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Potentially less raw performance than the Dimensity 9300+
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (100% in 19 min)
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- 50W wireless charging
- Shorter battery endurance (12:32h active use)
- Potentially higher power consumption
Display Comparison
Both the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Xiaomi 14T Pro boast impressive displays, achieving peak brightness levels of 1247 nits and 1228 nits respectively. This ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the difference is minimal, the S25 FE edges out the 14T Pro in peak brightness. Both are likely utilizing AMOLED panels, though specific panel technology (LTPO) isn’t specified. The lack of information on refresh rates and PWM dimming frequencies prevents a complete assessment of display quality, but the high brightness suggests a premium viewing experience on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. Both manufacturers are known for their image processing prowess, but Samsung typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is crucial for video recording and low-light photography, but its presence isn’t confirmed for either device. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses, the main camera’s capabilities will define the photographic experience.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ features a unique tri-cluster configuration with three Cortex-X4 cores clocked at 2.85GHz, potentially offering superior multi-core performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE’s Exynos 2400. The Exynos 2400 utilizes a 10-core setup, including a single high-performance Cortex-X4 core at 3.2GHz, but its architecture is more complex, potentially leading to increased power consumption. The 4nm fabrication process is shared, but the Dimensity 9300+'s core configuration suggests an advantage in demanding tasks. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed isn’t specified, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE’s 45W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 65% and likely over an hour for a full charge. However, the S25 FE compensates with superior battery endurance, lasting 42:37 hours on a single charge, compared to the 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h. The S25 FE also supports 15W Qi2 wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering greater convenience. The 14T Pro offers 50W wireless charging, a respectable figure, but still slower than the S25 FE’s overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE if you need exceptional battery life, reliable software support, and Qi2 wireless charging compatibility. It’s ideal for users who prioritize all-day use and a balanced experience. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prefer blazing-fast performance, the quickest charging speeds available (100% in 19 minutes), and aren’t as concerned with maximizing battery endurance – you’re a power user who doesn’t mind topping up frequently.