Choosing a new Samsung phone can be tough, especially with so many great options. The Galaxy S20 FE 2022 and the Galaxy A53 5G are both popular choices, but they cater to different needs. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The S20 FE 2022 offers superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 865, making it ideal for gamers and power users. The A53 5G shines with its excellent battery life and vibrant display, appealing to those prioritizing longevity and media consumption. It's a close call, but performance gives the S20 FE the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/200 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 01 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm (6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | Virtual proximity sensing
Bixby natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, PD3.0
15W wireless (Qi)
4.5W reverse wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cloud White, Cloud Lavender, Cloud Navy | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | SM-G781NK, SM-G781NK22 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 520 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 865)
- Premium Feel
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Good Camera System
- Shorter Battery Life
- Inconsistent Image Processing
- Can be more expensive
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Excellent Battery Life
- Vibrant Display
- More Affordable
- Consistent Camera Performance
- Slower Performance (Exynos 1280)
- Less Premium Build
- Slower Charging (25W)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G boasts a vibrant Super AMOLED display with a measured 830 nits of peak brightness and an impressive contrast ratio (nominally infinite). While the S20 FE 2022 also has a Super AMOLED display, its brightness is slightly lower. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates, but the A53's display feels a bit more refined.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems. The A53 5G generally produces more consistent and pleasing images in various lighting conditions, with improved image processing. The S20 FE 2022 can capture slightly more detail in good lighting, but its image processing can sometimes be inconsistent. Video recording is comparable on both devices.
Performance
Here's where the S20 FE 2022 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly faster performance than the A53 5G's Exynos 1280. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the S20 FE. The A53 is still capable, but it won't handle demanding tasks as effortlessly.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A53 5G takes the crown in battery life. Its endurance rating of 113 hours is exceptional, easily lasting a full day and a half, or even two days for moderate users. The S20 FE 2022 offers decent battery life, but it won't match the A53's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 is perfect for users who demand high performance, enjoy gaming, and want a more premium feel. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a great choice for those prioritizing battery life, a beautiful display, and a more budget-friendly price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the S20 FE 2022 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and gaming, the S20 FE 2022 is worth the investment. However, if battery life and a beautiful display are your top priorities, the A53 5G offers excellent value.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Both phones receive regular software updates from Samsung. However, the A53 5G, being newer, may receive updates for a slightly longer period.
