Samsung Galaxy Quantum 2 vs A52: A Detailed Performance and Feature Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and security, the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 2 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ delivers significantly faster processing speeds, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the A52 offers a brighter display and comparable battery life, the Quantum 2’s processing power justifies its position as the superior choice for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Quantum 2 | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 78 Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 13 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 23 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~524 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| 120Hz@FHD / 60Hz@QHD refresh rate | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm), QRNG security chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Violet | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-A826S | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS |
| Price | About 520 EUR | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.0 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 261282 (v8) GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 2
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 855+)
- Enhanced security with QRNG chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Older chipset architecture
- Display specifications unknown, likely inferior to A52
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Brighter display (794 nits)
- Efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Comparable battery life (105h endurance)
- Lower processing power compared to Quantum 2
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52 holds a clear advantage in display brightness, achieving a measured peak of 794 nits. While the Quantum 2’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s unlikely to match this level of brightness. The A52’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks. However, without knowing the Quantum 2’s panel technology or refresh rate, a complete assessment is difficult. The A52’s brightness makes it more usable outdoors in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Quantum 2’s higher processing power could enable faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The A52 likely benefits from Samsung’s more recent software optimizations. The absence of details on the Quantum 2’s camera system makes it difficult to definitively assess its capabilities against the A52.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Quantum 2’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a significant step up from the A52’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 855+ features an octa-core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 720G’s 2.3 GHz. This translates to substantially faster CPU and GPU performance, benefiting gaming, video editing, and overall responsiveness. The 7nm process node of the 855+ also offers better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The Quantum 2 is the clear winner for performance-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both the Quantum 2 and A52 share a 25W wired charging capability, with the A52 claiming a 50% charge in 30 minutes. Both devices have an endurance rating of 105 hours. This suggests similar battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. The A52’s efficiency gains from the Snapdragon 720G may offset any capacity differences, resulting in comparable real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 2 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, or require enhanced security features thanks to the QRNG chipset. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52 if you prioritize a vibrant display, long battery life, and a more modern software experience, and are willing to trade raw processing power for these benefits.