Samsung Galaxy Note10+ vs. LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around capability and a mature software experience, the Samsung Galaxy Note10+ remains a compelling choice. While the LG V60 boasts a newer Snapdragon 865 chipset, the Note10+'s excellent display, refined S Pen features, and faster charging provide a more polished user experience, especially considering the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global, LATAM | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - Canada | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August 07. Released 2019, August 23 | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, April 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 77.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Stylus, 42ms latency (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop" *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~498 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 114.0 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ | P-OLED, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAMAdreno 640 - USA/China | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 200 entries | - |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | CIF | - |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.1, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | FM radio (USA model only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0 | - |
| Games | Downloadable | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless | Wired, PD2.0, QC4 Wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 450 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 4300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aura Glow, Aura White, Aura Black, Aura Blue | Classy Blue, Classy White |
| Models | SM-N975F, SM-N975U, SM-N9750, SM-N975U1, SM-N975W, SM-N975N, SM-N975X, SCV45 | LM-V600VML, LMV600VML |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 870 EUR |
| SAR | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.19 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -95.1dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 107h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 342208 (v7), 438622 (v8) GeekBench: 10403 (v4.4), 2154 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
- Excellent display brightness and color accuracy
- Versatile S Pen functionality
- Faster 45W wired charging and reverse wireless charging
- Older Exynos 9825/Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Software support nearing end-of-life
LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
- LG’s software update history is less reliable
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Note10+ features a display capable of reaching 794 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the LG V60’s brightness isn’t specified, Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology typically delivers superior contrast – rated as infinite (nominal) on the Note10+ – and color accuracy. Both devices offer large displays suitable for multimedia consumption, but the Note10+’s established display calibration and brightness advantage give it an edge. The absence of refresh rate information for the V60 means it likely lacks the smoother scrolling experience becoming standard on higher-end devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' are limited. The LG V60 likely benefits from the improved image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Note10+’s camera system, while excellent, is hampered by the older chipset’s processing capabilities. Without specific sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the V60’s newer hardware gives it a probable advantage in image quality and video stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the V60 is unlikely to significantly impact overall camera performance.
Performance
The LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) chipset represents a generational leap over the Samsung Galaxy Note10+'s Exynos 9825 (7nm) or Snapdragon 855 (7nm) depending on the region. The Snapdragon 865 utilizes newer Cortex-A77 cores compared to the Note10+'s A75 cores, resulting in improved single-core performance. While the Note10+’s octa-core CPU is capable, the V60’s chipset offers a more efficient architecture and better sustained performance, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. However, the Note10+’s LPDDR4X RAM is comparable to the V60’s, mitigating some of the chipset difference. The 7nm+ process of the Snapdragon 865 also suggests better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Note10+ boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating solid battery life. It supports 45W wired charging with PD3.0, 15W wireless charging (Qi), and 4.5W reverse wireless charging – a comprehensive charging solution. The LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW supports wired charging with PD2.0 and QC4, and wireless charging, but lacks the reverse wireless charging feature. While the V60’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Note10+'s faster charging speeds and reverse wireless capabilities provide a more convenient and versatile charging experience. The 107-hour endurance rating suggests the Note10+ is more efficient overall, despite the newer chipset in the V60.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10+ if you need a versatile device with a focus on productivity, creative tasks, and a premium user experience enhanced by the S Pen. Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW if you prioritize 5G connectivity, potentially better sustained performance in demanding games due to the Snapdragon 865, and are comfortable with LG’s software implementation.