Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo vs Galaxy S4: A Detailed Showdown

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo and Galaxy S4 were flagship devices in their time, offering impressive features for their era. Both are now considered vintage smartphones, but which one holds up better today? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and performance to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Note 3 Neo edges out the Galaxy S4 primarily due to its significantly longer battery life (74h vs 65h). While both offer solid performance, the Neo's slightly more powerful chipset and superior sunlight readability give it a slight advantage for those seeking a reliable vintage device.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo Samsung I9500 Galaxy S4
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versionsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-N7505HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - SM-N7505-
EDGEClass 10Yes
GPRSClass 10Yes
SpeedHSPA 42.2(LTE)/21.1(3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA
 HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-N750-
Launch
Announced2014, January. Released 2014, February2013, March. Released 2013, April
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions148.4 x 77.4 x 8.6 mm (5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 in)136.6 x 69.8 x 7.9 mm (5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 in)
KeyboardQWERTY-
SIMMicro-SIMMicro-SIM
Weight162.5 g (5.71 oz)130 g (4.59 oz)
 Stylus-
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~441 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.6% screen-to-body ratio)5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Platform
CPUHexa-core (4x1.3 GHz Cortex A7 & 2x1.7 GHz Cortex A15)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A15 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A7)
ChipsetExynos 5260 HexaExynos 5410 Octa (28 nm)
GPUMali-T624 MP4PowerVR SGX544MP3
OSAndroid 4.3 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 5.1.1 (Lollipop), TouchWiz UIAndroid 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 5.0.1 (Lollipop), TouchWiz UI
Memory
Call records30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed callsYes
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal16GB (11GB user available), 2GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM
Phonebook1000 contacts, Photo call2000 entries
 eMMC 5.0eMMC 5.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.6, 31mm (standard), AF13 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.14µm, AF
Video1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec.1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-Dual video call
Single2 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide)2 MP, f/2.4, 31mm (standard)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGmicroUSB 2.0 (MHL 2 TV-out), OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot
Features
BrowserWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML-
GamesYesDownloadable
JavaYes, MIDP 2.0Yes
MessagingSMS, MMS, EmailSMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, IM
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, temperature, humidity, gesture
 ANT+ S-Voice natural language commands and dictationANT+ S-Voice natural language commands and dictation Air gestures
Battery
Charging-Wireless (Qi) (market dependent)
Music playUp to 64 hUp to 62 h
Stand-byUp to 540 h (3G)Up to 370 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 18 h (3G)Up to 17 h (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 3100 mAh, removableLi-Ion 2600 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Green, Pink, RedWhite Frost, Black Mist, Arctic Blue, Black Edition
ModelsSM-N750, SM-N7505, SM-N750K, SM-N750S, SM-N7507, SM-N750L, SM-N7500Q, SM-N7506V, SM-N7505LGT-I9500, SGH-I337M, SGH-M919, GT-I9507V, SHV-E330L, SPH-L720T, SHV-E300S, SHV-E300L, SHV-E300K, GT-I9507, SGH-M919N
PriceAbout 320 EURAbout 320 EUR
SAR0.54 W/kg (head)     0.70 W/kg (body)0.85 W/kg (head)     1.55 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.25 W/kg (head)     0.27 W/kg (body)0.42 W/kg (head)     0.54 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -96.1dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB Noise -95.9dB / Crosstalk -96.4dB
Battery life Endurance rating 74h Endurance rating 65h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.487 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 3.352:1 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker Voice 68dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 75dB Voice 70dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 77dB
OUR TESTS
Audio qualityNoise -96.1dB / Crosstalk -94.9dBNoise -95.9dB / Crosstalk -96.4dB
Battery (old)Endurance rating 74hEndurance rating 65h
CameraPhoto / VideoPhoto / Video
DisplayContrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.487 (sunlight)Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 3.352:1 (sunlight)
LoudspeakerVoice 68dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 75dBVoice 70dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 77dB

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo

  • Exceptional battery life (74h)
  • Slightly better sunlight readability
  • Larger display
  • Stylus functionality

  • Older chipset, limited gaming performance
  • Camera quality is dated
  • Potentially harder to find replacement parts

Samsung I9500 Galaxy S4

  • Wireless charging (market dependent)
  • Slightly more compact design
  • Historically considered a slightly better camera (though details are lacking)

  • Shorter battery life (65h)
  • Lower sunlight readability
  • Older chipset, limited gaming performance
  • Potentially harder to find replacement parts

Display Comparison

Both phones feature Super AMOLED displays with a nominal infinite contrast ratio. However, the Note 3 Neo boasts a slightly better sunlight readability score (3.487:1) compared to the S4 (3.352:1), making it easier to view outdoors. The Note 3 Neo's screen is generally larger, offering more screen real estate.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer Photo/Video capabilities, but specific megapixel counts and aperture details are missing from the provided data. Generally, the Galaxy S4 was considered to have a slightly better camera system at the time, but both are limited by their age and sensor technology. Image quality in low light will be a significant weakness for both.

Performance

The Note 3 Neo utilizes the Exynos 5260 Hexa chipset, featuring a combination of Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15 cores. The Galaxy S4 is powered by the Exynos 5410 Octa, also with a mix of these cores. While the S4 has more cores, the Note 3 Neo's slightly higher clock speeds on some cores give it a marginal performance edge in real-world usage. Both phones will handle everyday tasks well, but demanding games may struggle.

Battery Life

This is where the Note 3 Neo truly shines. Its endurance rating of 74 hours significantly surpasses the Galaxy S4's 65 hours. This difference translates to noticeably longer usage between charges, a crucial factor for a vintage device.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo is ideal for users prioritizing battery life and decent performance for everyday tasks. It's a good choice for those who want a large screen and stylus functionality. The Galaxy S4 is better suited for users who appreciate wireless charging (market dependent) and a slightly more compact design, though battery life is a compromise.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are replacement parts readily available for these phones?
Finding replacement parts for these older devices can be challenging. Availability varies depending on the part and your location. Expect to pay a premium for used or refurbished components.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Neither phone is ideal for modern gaming. Both have older chipsets that will struggle with demanding titles. However, the Note 3 Neo's slightly more powerful chipset might offer a marginally better experience.