Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo vs. Galaxy J7 (2016): A Detailed Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo and Galaxy J7 (2016) represent different eras of Samsung's smartphone evolution. The Note 3 Neo, a refined version of a flagship, offered a premium experience, while the J7 (2016) aimed for a more accessible mid-range market. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to see which phone holds up better today.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Galaxy J7 (2016) edges out the Note 3 Neo thanks to its superior battery life and slightly improved display visibility in sunlight. While the Note 3 Neo boasts a unique hexa-core processor, the J7's more modern chipset and longer support make it the more practical choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versionsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-N7505HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - SM-N75051, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40
EDGEClass 10-
GPRSClass 10-
SpeedHSPA 42.2(LTE)/21.1(3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SM-N750-
Launch
Announced2014, January. Released 2014, February2016, March 29. Released 2016, April
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame
Dimensions148.4 x 77.4 x 8.6 mm (5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 in)151.7 x 76 x 7.8 mm (5.97 x 2.99 x 0.31 in)
KeyboardQWERTY-
SIMMicro-SIMSingle SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight162.5 g (5.71 oz)170 g (6.00 oz)
 Stylus-
Display
Resolution720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.6% screen-to-body ratio)5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Platform
CPUHexa-core (4x1.3 GHz Cortex A7 & 2x1.7 GHz Cortex A15)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetExynos 5260 HexaQualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 (28 nm)Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm)
GPUMali-T624 MP4Adreno 405Mali-T830 MP1
OSAndroid 4.3 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 5.1.1 (Lollipop), TouchWiz UIAndroid 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.1 (Oreo)
Memory
Call records30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls-
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal16GB (11GB user available), 2GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM
Phonebook1000 contacts, Photo call-
 eMMC 5.0eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.6, 31mm (standard), AF13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF
Video1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec.1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single2 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide)5 MP, f/1.9
Video1080p@30fps-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE4.1, A2DP
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes (market dependent for dual-SIM model)
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoFM radio, RDS, recording
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGmicroUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
BrowserWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML-
GamesYes-
JavaYes, MIDP 2.0-
MessagingSMS, MMS, Email-
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, proximity
 ANT+ S-Voice natural language commands and dictationANT+
Battery
Music playUp to 64 hUp to 96 h
Stand-byUp to 540 h (3G)-
Talk timeUp to 18 h (3G)Up to 23 h (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 3100 mAh, removableLi-Ion 3300 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Green, Pink, RedWhite, Black, Gold, Rose Gold
ModelsSM-N750, SM-N7505, SM-N750K, SM-N750S, SM-N7507, SM-N750L, SM-N7500Q, SM-N7506V, SM-N7505LSM-J710FN, SM-J710F, SM-J710H, SM-J710M, SM-J710GN, SM-J710MN, SM-J710K, SM-J7108, SM-J710FQ
PriceAbout 320 EURAbout 230 EUR
SAR0.54 W/kg (head)     0.70 W/kg (body)1.10 W/kg (head)     1.01 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.25 W/kg (head)     0.27 W/kg (body)0.35 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -96.1dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB Noise -92.4dB / Crosstalk -92.3dB
Battery life Endurance rating 74h Endurance rating 101h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.487 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.902 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker Voice 68dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 75dB Voice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 68dB
Performance- Basemark OS II 2.0: 1007Basemark X: 11199
OUR TESTS
Audio qualityNoise -96.1dB / Crosstalk -94.9dBNoise -92.4dB / Crosstalk -92.3dB
Battery (old)Endurance rating 74hEndurance rating 101h
CameraPhoto / VideoPhoto / Video
DisplayContrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.487 (sunlight)Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.902 (sunlight)
LoudspeakerVoice 68dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 75dBVoice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 68dB
Performance-Basemark OS II 2.0: 1007Basemark X: 11199

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo

  • Compact size
  • Stylus support
  • Higher resolution display
  • Unique hexa-core processor (for its time)

  • Older chipset
  • Shorter battery life
  • Outdated software support
  • Less bright display

Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)

  • Longer battery life
  • Brighter display (better sunlight visibility)
  • More modern chipset
  • Better software support (at the time)

  • Lower resolution display compared to Note 3 Neo
  • Less powerful processor than Note 3 Neo (in some benchmarks)
  • Design is less premium

Display Comparison

Both phones feature displays with a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term. However, the J7 (2016) exhibits a slightly better sunlight readability score (3.902 vs 3.487), suggesting a brighter panel. The Note 3 Neo's display, while good for its time, may appear less vibrant by today's standards. Screen sizes are similar, around 5.5 inches, but resolution differs; the Note 3 Neo has a higher resolution (1920 x 1080) offering slightly sharper visuals.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are not detailed, but generally, the J7 (2016) had a more capable camera system. The Note 3 Neo's camera was decent for its era, but the J7 (2016) typically offered better image quality, especially in low light, and more features. Both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities.

Performance

The Note 3 Neo's Exynos 5260 hexa-core processor was impressive for its time, utilizing a combination of Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15 cores. However, the J7 (2016)'s Octa-core Snapdragon 617 or Exynos 7870 (depending on region) offers more consistent performance and better efficiency. Modern apps and Android versions will run smoother on the J7 (2016).

Battery Life

This is where the J7 (2016) truly shines. With an endurance rating of 101 hours, it significantly outperforms the Note 3 Neo's 74 hours. This translates to noticeably longer battery life for everyday use.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo is best suited for enthusiasts seeking a compact, powerful device with a stylus and a taste of nostalgia. The Galaxy J7 (2016) is a better option for users prioritizing battery life, a brighter display, and a more modern Android experience, especially on a budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Note 3 Neo still worth buying?
Only if you're a collector or specifically want a compact phone with a stylus and don't mind the limitations of an older device. Otherwise, there are better options available.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Galaxy J7 (2016) received more software updates than the Note 3 Neo, although both are now beyond their official support lifecycles.