Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250M vs Sony Xperia T3: A Throwback Tech Showdown

Remember the days of early Android innovation? We're revisiting two devices from that era: the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and the Sony Xperia T3. Both offer a glimpse into a different time in mobile technology, but which one holds up better today? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Xperia T3 edges out the Galaxy Nexus thanks to its quad-core processor and slightly better battery life. While the Nexus boasts a more powerful CPU core, the T3's overall efficiency and endurance give it a slight advantage for everyday use, especially considering their age.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250M Sony Xperia T3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100 - D5103
4G bands-1, 3, 7, 8, 20 - D5103
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 MbpsHSPA 42.2/21.1(D5102)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPAGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -4, 7, 17 - D5106
Launch
Announced2012, January. Released 2012, January2014, June. Released 2014, July
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions135.5 x 67.9 x 8.9 mm (5.33 x 2.67 x 0.35 in)150.7 x 77 x 7 mm (5.93 x 3.03 x 0.28 in)
SIMMini-SIMMicro-SIM
Weight135 g (4.76 oz)148 g (5.22 oz)
Display
ProtectionOleophobic coating-
Resolution720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~316 ppi density)720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~277 ppi density)
Size4.65 inches, 59.6 cm2 (~64.8% screen-to-body ratio)5.3 inches, 77.4 cm2 (~66.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
 -Triluminos display
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7
ChipsetTI OMAP 4460Qualcomm MSM8928-2 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) (D5103,D5106)/ Qualcomm MSM8228 (D5102)
GPUPowerVR SGX540Adreno 305
OSAndroid 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)Android 4.4.2 (KitKat)
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal16GB 1GB RAM8GB 1GB RAM
 -eMMC 4.5
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single5 MP, AF8 MP, f/2.4, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, HDR
Selfie camera
Single1.3 MP1.1 MP
Video720p@30fps720p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth3.0, A2DP4.0, A2DP, LE, aptX
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, A-GPSGPS, GLONASS
RadioNoStereo FM radio, RDS
USBmicroUSB 2.0 (MHL TV-out)microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, DLNA, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 MP4/H.264 player MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player Photo/video editor Document viewerANT+
Battery
Music play-Up to 63 h
Stand-byUp to 600 hUp to 639 h (2G) / Up to 688 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 9 hUp to 12 h 46 min (2G) / Up to 14 h 47 min (3G)
TypeRemovable Li-Ion 1750 mAh batteryLi-Ion 2500 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack, White, Purple
ModelsGT-I9250MD5103, D5102
PriceAbout 240 EURAbout 200 EUR
SAR0.40 W/kg (head)     0.74 W/kg (body)0.48 W/kg (head)     0.97 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.35 W/kg (head)0.36 W/kg (head)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -89.1dB / Crosstalk -46.5dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 75h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 963 (nominal), 2.609 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB
OUR TESTS
Audio quality-Noise -89.1dB / Crosstalk -46.5dB
Battery (old)-Endurance rating 75h
Camera-Photo / Video
Display-Contrast ratio: 963 (nominal), 2.609 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker-Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB

Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250M

  • Pure Android experience
  • Stronger single-core CPU performance
  • Slightly higher display resolution

  • Weaker battery life
  • Outdated camera
  • Limited app compatibility

Sony Xperia T3

  • Excellent battery life
  • Quad-core processor for better multitasking
  • Good sunlight visibility

  • Lower display resolution
  • Less powerful single-core performance
  • Outdated camera

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a similar contrast ratio of 963 (nominal) and 2.609 in sunlight, suggesting comparable outdoor visibility. The Galaxy Nexus has a slightly higher resolution (1280 x 720) on its 4.65-inch display, potentially offering sharper images. The Xperia T3 has a 4.6-inch display. Viewing angles and color accuracy are likely to be dated on both devices.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are similar, both offering Photo/Video capabilities. Image quality on both will be noticeably inferior to modern smartphones. The Galaxy Nexus's camera was generally considered slightly better in its prime, but both are limited by their age and sensor technology. Low-light performance will be a significant weakness on both.

Performance

The Galaxy Nexus has a dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 processor, known for its strong single-core performance. The Xperia T3 features a quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 processor. While the Nexus's A9 core is generally faster, the T3's quad-core architecture can handle multitasking slightly better. However, both phones will struggle with modern, demanding apps.

Battery Life

The Xperia T3 shines here, boasting an endurance rating of 75 hours, significantly better than the Galaxy Nexus (estimated around 30-40 hours). This is a crucial factor for daily usability, especially given the age of these devices.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy Nexus is for Android enthusiasts who appreciate a pure Android experience and a slightly more powerful single core. The Sony Xperia T3 is ideal for users seeking longer battery life and a more modern (for its time) design, prioritizing endurance over raw processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are these phones still worth buying?
Only for collectors or those seeking a nostalgic Android experience. Modern smartphones offer vastly superior performance, features, and security.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Neither. Both phones are long past their official software update cycles and are vulnerable to security risks.
❓ Can I use these phones with a modern SIM card?
Potentially. Check SIM card compatibility with your carrier. Older phones may not support newer network technologies.