The Samsung Galaxy M62, released in 2021, offered a compelling blend of performance and battery life at its price point. Now, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) enters the arena with a newer chipset and significantly faster charging. This comparison dissects these two devices to determine which one reigns supreme in today’s market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and 5G connectivity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more efficient experience. However, the M62’s Exynos 9825 still holds its own in raw processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired
4.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | SM-M625F, SM-M625F/DS | 2201116SI |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M62
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Large battery capacity
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Slower 25W charging
- No 5G connectivity
- Older chipset architecture
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- 67W fast charging for minimal downtime
- 5G connectivity for future-proof networking
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially less raw CPU power than the Exynos 9825
- Reliance on software optimization for camera performance
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable for M62), the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ benefits from a newer manufacturing process. Display specifics are limited for the M62, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s panel is expected to offer good color accuracy and brightness. The absence of high refresh rate information for the M62 puts it at a disadvantage against potentially smoother scrolling on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond the main sensors are sparse for both devices. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s camera system is likely to be more advanced, benefiting from newer image processing algorithms. While sensor size data is missing, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s focus on camera features suggests a more refined photography experience. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy M62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz versus the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. However, the Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers superior power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance under load. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s 5G modem is a significant advantage, offering future-proof connectivity, while the M62 lacks 5G support.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy M62 packs a large battery, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s 67W charging is a game-changer. The M62’s 25W charging feels slow in comparison. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ can reach 100% charge in just 42 minutes, while the M62 will take considerably longer. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 also contributes to better battery life, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M62 if you prioritize sustained CPU performance for demanding tasks and don't mind slower charging speeds. It's ideal for users who frequently edit photos/videos or play graphically intensive games. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value rapid charging, 5G connectivity, and a more modern chipset with improved power efficiency, making it perfect for everyday use and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9825 in the Galaxy M62 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9825 is a capable chip, but its 7nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process. While it won't necessarily overheat, users may experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming, leading to a slight performance dip. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ is likely to maintain more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G safe for long-term battery health?
Xiaomi incorporates multiple safety mechanisms into its 67W charging system to protect the battery. While fast charging *can* theoretically degrade battery health faster than slower charging, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s intelligent charging algorithms aim to minimize this effect. The phone dynamically adjusts the charging speed based on battery condition and usage patterns.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695 handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience for most users. The 6nm process helps maintain consistent performance without excessive heat buildup.
