Samsung Galaxy M62 vs F62: A Deep Dive into Samsung's Exynos-Powered Mid-Rangers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy F62 emerges as the slightly better value. While both phones offer identical performance thanks to the Exynos 9825, the F62's marketing often positions it with more aggressive pricing, making it the more compelling choice for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M62 | Samsung Galaxy F62 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2021, February 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 03 | Available. Released 2021, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 7000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Models | SM-M625F, SM-M625F/DS | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M62
- Identical Exynos 9825 performance to the F62
- Large battery capacity for all-day use
- Potential for wider carrier availability
- May be priced higher than the F62 for the same specs
- Likely lacks advanced display features like high refresh rate
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Identical Exynos 9825 performance to the M62
- Large battery capacity for all-day use
- Often available at a more competitive price
- May be primarily sold online, limiting in-person access
- Likely lacks advanced display features like high refresh rate
Display Comparison
Both the M62 and F62 feature displays that, while large, don't push the boundaries of display technology. Given the identical chipsets, the display experience will be largely the same. We can infer, based on the market segment, that both likely utilize Super AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, specific details like peak brightness (in nits) and color accuracy (Delta E) are not provided. The large screen size is geared towards media consumption, but the absence of a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) is a notable omission compared to some competitors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is where marketing and software processing can create differentiation, even with similar hardware. While sensor details are missing, it's reasonable to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, macro, and depth sensor. The usefulness of the 2MP macro lens is questionable, offering limited detail. The primary sensor's aperture and size will be the most critical factors for low-light performance. Image processing algorithms will determine the final look of photos – Samsung's tendency towards vibrant, saturated colors will likely be present on both devices. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a drawback, potentially leading to softer images and less stable video.
Performance
The heart of both devices is the Exynos 9825 (7nm). This chipset, featuring an octa-core configuration with 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 cores, 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, delivers capable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The identical CPU and GPU mean benchmark scores will be virtually indistinguishable. Thermal management will be a key factor; the 7nm process helps, but sustained heavy loads could lead to throttling. The RAM configuration (likely 6GB or 8GB LPDDR4X, based on the era) will also impact multitasking performance, but is expected to be the same on both models.
Battery Life
Both the M62 and F62 pack substantial batteries and support 25W wired charging, with 4.5W reverse wired charging. The actual battery capacity isn't specified, but given the phone's size and target market, it's likely in the 6000mAh range. 25W charging is adequate, providing a full charge in approximately 1.5-2 hours. The large battery capacity translates to excellent battery life, easily lasting a full day of moderate to heavy use. The 4.5W reverse wired charging is primarily for topping up accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M62 if you prioritize a potentially wider availability through specific carrier channels or prefer the aesthetic design associated with the M-series. Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you're focused on maximizing value for your money and are comfortable with a device often sold primarily online, potentially benefiting from more frequent discounts and promotions.