Samsung Galaxy M62 vs A72: Which Samsung Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is the better choice. While the M62 boasts a more powerful processor on paper, the A72’s Snapdragon 720G offers a smoother, more consistent experience, coupled with a brighter display and comparable battery life, making it the more well-rounded device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M62 | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 03 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-M625F, SM-M625F/DS | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | - | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279342 (v8) GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M62
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance for demanding tasks.
- May offer better value if found at a significantly lower price.
- Reverse wired charging capability.
- Older chipset may suffer from thermal throttling.
- Likely less efficient power consumption.
- Display brightness is likely lower than the A72.
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- More efficient Snapdragon 720G processor.
- Smoother, more consistent user experience.
- Less raw CPU power compared to the M62.
- May be slightly more expensive than the M62.
- Similar charging speed to the M62.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A72 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 825 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the M62. This makes the A72 far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, typical of Samsung’s AMOLED panels, but the A72’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. While both likely utilize similar AMOLED technology, the A72’s superior brightness is a key differentiator for visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a 'Photo / Video' camera experience, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A72’s image processing is likely more refined, benefiting from Qualcomm’s ISP. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A72, if present, would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The M62’s older chipset might lack some of the advanced computational photography features found in newer Snapdragon processors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy M62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm) was a flagship processor, featuring a more complex CPU configuration – octa-core with 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 cores, 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75, and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55. The A72’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is a mid-range chip with an octa-core configuration of 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver. While the Exynos 9825 has higher clock speeds, the Snapdragon 720G’s 8nm process is more efficient, potentially leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The M62’s older architecture may struggle to maintain peak performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the M62 and A72 share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the M62’s potentially more power-hungry chipset. Both support 25W wired charging, and 4.5W reverse wired charging. The A72’s more efficient Snapdragon 720G likely offsets the M62’s larger battery capacity (if any difference exists), resulting in similar all-day usability. The 25W charging speed will deliver a 0-100% charge in a similar timeframe for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M62 if you prioritize maximum processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and are willing to potentially trade off some thermal efficiency. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A72 if you value a brighter, more usable display, a more efficient processor for everyday tasks, and a generally smoother user experience without worrying about potential throttling under sustained load.