Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs. Galaxy M62: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift and improved efficiency compared to the M62’s Exynos 9825, all while offering 5G connectivity. While the M62 may appeal to those prioritizing a potentially larger screen (size not specified in data), the A52s 5G’s balanced package wins out.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M62 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 03 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | SM-M625F, SM-M625F/DS | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | - | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M62
- Potentially larger display size (unconfirmed)
- Historically powerful Exynos 9825 chipset
- Competitive price point
- Less efficient Exynos 9825 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower display brightness
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Higher display brightness (800 nits)
- Potentially smaller display size
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to M62 despite efficiency gains
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, a significant advantage over the M62, which lacks specific brightness data. This higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays are described as having an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the A52s 5G’s Super AMOLED panel likely delivers richer colors and deeper blacks. The absence of refresh rate data for the M62 suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the A52s 5G is commonly found with a 120Hz panel (though not specified in the provided data).
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the A52s 5G’s camera system is generally regarded as more versatile and capable in real-world usage. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the Snapdragon 778G’s image signal processor (ISP) offers advanced features like improved low-light performance and faster image processing. The M62’s older Exynos ISP may struggle to match the A52s 5G’s image quality, particularly in challenging conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also more common in A52s 5G models, further enhancing image and video stability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is built on a more modern and efficient process node than the M62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – offers a more balanced and powerful architecture compared to the M62’s 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 and 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 setup. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an Endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the M62’s potentially larger capacity (not specified). However, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency in the A52s 5G means it can deliver similar endurance with potentially a smaller battery. Both devices support 25W wired charging, and 4.5W reverse wired charging, meaning charging times will likely be similar. The A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may result in slightly less heat generation during charging, potentially prolonging battery health over the long term.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M62 if you prioritize a potentially larger display and are seeking the absolute lowest price point, accepting compromises in processing power and 5G connectivity. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother, more responsive user experience, 5G capabilities, and a more modern chipset with better thermal management, even if it means potentially paying a slight premium.