Samsung Galaxy M62 vs. Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo wins. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the M62’s 25W, offsetting the similar endurance ratings. However, users heavily invested in sustained performance, particularly gaming, may find the Exynos 9825 in the M62 more capable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M62 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | SM-M625F, SM-M625F/DS | XT2245-1 |
| Price | - | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M62
- Potentially higher sustained CPU performance due to the Exynos 9825.
- Larger battery capacity (implied, given its focus).
- May offer expandable storage (typical for Samsung M-series).
- Significantly slower 25W charging.
- Older chipset and potentially less efficient.
- Likely larger and heavier form factor.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Incredibly fast 68W wired charging.
- More modern and compact design.
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset.
- Potentially lower sustained CPU performance compared to the Exynos 9825.
- May lack expandable storage.
- Wireless charging is limited to 5W.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the M62. While the M62’s panel size isn’t specified, the Edge 30 Neo’s 6.28-inch OLED offers a more vibrant and visible experience outdoors. The Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a true black level typical of OLED technology, likely exceeding the M62’s contrast capabilities. The smaller size of the Edge 30 Neo also contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Edge 30 Neo likely benefits from newer image processing algorithms inherent in the Snapdragon 695’s ISP. Without specific sensor size or aperture details for the M62, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The inclusion of OIS on the Edge 30 Neo (assumed based on Motorola’s recent offerings) would provide a significant advantage in video stabilization and low-light photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy M62’s Exynos 9825, built on a 7nm process, features a more complex CPU configuration – octa-core with a mix of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores – aiming for high single-core and multi-core performance. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm node, offers improved power efficiency. While the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores clock lower at 2.2 GHz, the 6nm process and optimized architecture can deliver comparable real-world performance for most tasks. The Exynos 9825 may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load, potentially impacting long gaming sessions, while the Snapdragon 695 is likely to maintain more consistent performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under an hour, while the Galaxy M62’s 25W charging is considerably slower. The Edge 30 Neo also supports 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the M62. This charging disparity makes the Edge 30 Neo far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M62 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use and value sustained CPU performance for tasks like video editing or extended gaming sessions. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more modern design, prioritize incredibly fast charging, and want a lighter, more pocketable device for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.