Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M56: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the groundbreaking 125W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the M56 offers a respectable experience, the Edge 50 Pro’s speed and convenience justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M56 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 17 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 17 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 77.3 x 7.2 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.28 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 530 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Light Green | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | SM-M566B, SM-M566B/DS | XT2403-2 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | 0.71 W/kg (head) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M56
- Familiar Samsung One UI experience
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Established brand reputation
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Older generation Exynos chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging
- Modern Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- High peak display brightness (1295 nits)
- 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Less established brand in some markets
- Motorola’s software update policy can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s display immediately stands out with a measured peak brightness of 1295 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Galaxy M56’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to fall short of this peak brightness. The Edge 50 Pro’s panel technology is likely to be AMOLED, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of LTPO information for either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rate technology for optimal power efficiency, but the higher brightness of the Motorola is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Galaxy M56, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Edge 50 Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It’s safe to assume the Motorola will offer more sophisticated image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting conditions. We can safely ignore the presence of 2MP macro cameras on either device as they offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 performance cores, alongside 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This architecture, built on a 4nm process, promises superior performance and efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy M56’s Exynos 1480 (4nm). The Exynos 1480’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – while seemingly faster on paper with the A78 cores, is an older generation architecture. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s newer Cortex-A715 cores offer improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock) and overall efficiency. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better sustained performance during gaming on the Motorola.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 125W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Samsung Galaxy M56’s 45W charging. While the M56 may have a larger battery capacity (not specified), the Edge 50 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Furthermore, the Edge 50 Pro includes 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the M56, adding to its convenience and versatility. The Edge 50 Pro’s battery life is reported at 11:59h of active use, demonstrating excellent efficiency despite the powerful chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M56 if you prioritize a familiar Samsung user experience and a reliable, if not groundbreaking, performance profile. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or require the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you value speed, efficiency, and cutting-edge charging technology. This phone is perfect for power users, gamers, and anyone who dislikes waiting for their phone to charge.