Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its 120W charging capability and 1283 nits peak brightness significantly outperform the Galaxy M55’s 45W charging and unspecified brightness, despite the M55’s slightly different CPU architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M55 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 28 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 28 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | SM-M556B, SM-M556B/DS | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | € 272.94 / $ 265.00 / £ 251.97 / ₹ 20,999 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.96 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M55
- Potentially refined Samsung software experience
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers solid mid-range performance
- 4nm process for improved efficiency
- Significantly slower 45W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- High peak brightness of 1283 nits
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use)
- MediaTek chipset may not have the same software optimization as Snapdragon
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for bloatware
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a clear advantage in display technology with a measured peak brightness of 1283 nits. While the Galaxy M55’s display specifications are not provided, this brightness level suggests superior outdoor visibility for the Redmi. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve power, but the Redmi’s higher peak brightness is a significant differentiator. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for both, but the Redmi’s brightness is a concrete advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensor, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s likely inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a common feature in this price bracket – would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording compared to a potentially OIS-less M55. Lens apertures are also critical; wider apertures (lower f-number) allow more light, improving image quality in challenging conditions. The absence of information on sensor size for both devices makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Redmi’s potential for OIS and a wider aperture lens gives it an edge.
Performance
Both devices utilize 4nm process nodes, indicating comparable power efficiency. However, the CPU architectures differ significantly. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features a MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores, prioritizing peak performance with its higher clocked A715 cores. The Galaxy M55 employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, using 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 and 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 cores alongside 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s newer core architecture (A715 vs A710) likely translates to better single-core performance, while the M55’s core count may offer advantages in multi-threaded tasks. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load, a potential issue the Dimensity chip may mitigate.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in battery and charging. Its active use score of 10:38h demonstrates excellent real-world endurance. Crucially, the 120W wired charging, supporting PD3.0, allows for a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Galaxy M55’s 45W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to reach 100%. While the M55’s battery capacity is unknown, the Redmi’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M55 if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience within the Samsung ecosystem and value a slightly different CPU core configuration. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a longer active use battery life as demonstrated by its 10:38h score.