Poco X6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly higher performance, and the 67W charging is substantially faster than the M55’s 45W. However, Samsung’s software experience and potentially more refined camera processing may appeal to some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M55 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 28 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 28 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | SM-M556B, SM-M556B/DS | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | € 272.94 / $ 265.00 / £ 251.97 / ₹ 20,999 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.96 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M55
- Potentially more refined software experience (Samsung One UI)
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Balanced overall performance
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than the Poco X6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- More powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display (1148 nits)
- Longer active use battery life (11:46h)
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for more bloatware
- Camera processing may be less refined than Samsung
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Galaxy M55. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, display technology details for the M55 are missing; however, given its market positioning, it likely lacks the high refresh rates and advanced features found in the X6 Pro. The X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is crucial for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Galaxy M55 are unavailable, but the Poco X6 Pro’s camera system is likely to offer a more versatile experience. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the X6 Pro’s image processing capabilities, combined with potentially larger sensors (details missing for both), will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The focus should be on the primary sensor performance, as the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on either device adds little practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco X6 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra versus the Samsung Galaxy M55’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra features a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, significantly outperforming the M55’s 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 and 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 cores. This architectural advantage, coupled with higher clock speeds, results in demonstrably faster CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s more modern architecture provides a performance edge.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro shines in battery charging speed, supporting 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy M55 is limited to 45W wired charging, meaning a slower recharge time. The X6 Pro also boasts an impressive 11:46h active use score, suggesting excellent battery life despite its focus on performance. While the M55’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M55 if you prioritize a familiar, polished software experience and value Samsung’s ecosystem. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you’re a mobile gamer, frequently transfer large files, or need the fastest possible charging speeds. Its superior chipset and faster charging make it ideal for power users.