Samsung Galaxy M53 vs M52 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M52 5G edges out the M53 thanks to its superior Snapdragon 778G chipset, offering smoother performance and 5G connectivity. While the M53 boasts a slightly brighter display, the M52 5G's overall package makes it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M53 | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2021, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Models | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS |
| Price | € 249.98 | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter Display
- Longer Battery Life (slightly)
- Large Display
- Less Powerful Processor
- No 5G Connectivity
- Slower Charging
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
- 5G Connectivity
- Smoother Performance
- Slightly Dimmer Display
- Shorter Battery Life (slightly)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature Super AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The M53 has a slightly higher peak brightness of 802 nits compared to the M52 5G's 777 nits, making it marginally better for outdoor visibility. However, both offer excellent contrast and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both offer versatile camera systems with main, ultrawide, and macro lenses. Image quality is good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance could be better on both devices. Video recording capabilities are similar, offering up to 4K resolution.
Performance
This is where the M52 5G takes a clear lead. The Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the M53. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the M52 5G. The M53's Dimensity 900 is still capable, but it shows its limitations under heavy load.
Battery Life
The M53 has a slight edge in battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the M52 5G's 123 hours. However, the difference is minimal and real-world usage will vary. Both phones support 25W wired charging, which is relatively slow compared to some competitors.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M53 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display and extended battery life, even if it means sacrificing some processing power. The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is best suited for those who value performance, 5G connectivity, and a more refined overall experience.