Samsung Galaxy M53 vs M33: Which Mid-Range Galaxy Should You Choose?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M53 boasts a brighter display and potentially better camera performance, while the M33 offers a more efficient chipset (Exynos 1280) and reverse charging. For media consumption and photography, the M53 edges ahead, but the M33 provides a smoother, more power-efficient experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M53 | Samsung Galaxy M33 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 198 g (Global) / 215 g (India) (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Models | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN | SM-M336B, SM-M336B/DS, SM-M336BU, SM-M336BU/DS, SM-M336K |
| Price | € 249.98 | £ 299.00 |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter Display (802 nits)
- Potentially Better Camera
- Exceptional Endurance Rating (114h)
- Less Efficient Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- No Reverse Charging
Samsung Galaxy M33
- More Efficient Chipset (Exynos 1280)
- Reverse Wired Charging (4.5W)
- Generally More Affordable
- Lower Display Brightness (Likely)
- Potentially Less Capable Camera
Display Comparison
The M53 takes a clear lead in display brightness, with a measured 802 nits compared to the M33's likely lower output (typical of Super AMOLED displays, but specific measurements are unavailable). Both feature Super AMOLED panels with FHD+ resolution, offering excellent color reproduction and viewing angles. The M53's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. However, the M53 is generally expected to have a more capable camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The M33 likely offers a competent camera setup, but may not match the M53's potential.
Performance
While both phones share the same CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), the chipset makes a significant difference. The M33's Exynos 1280 (5nm) is generally considered more efficient and provides smoother performance than the M53's Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm). Expect slightly better app loading times and multitasking on the M33.
Battery Life
The M53's endurance rating of 114h is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent battery life. However, this rating is likely based on a specific usage scenario. The M33's Exynos 1280 chipset contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M53 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, potentially better camera quality, and don't mind slightly shorter battery life. The Samsung Galaxy M33 is a great choice for those seeking a smoother, more power-efficient experience, reverse charging capabilities, and a slightly more budget-friendly option.