Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Galaxy A73 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A73 5G generally edges out the M53 thanks to its superior chipset and overall smoother performance. While the M53 boasts impressive battery endurance, the A73's Snapdragon 778G provides a more refined user experience, making it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M53 | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | € 249.98 | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Premium Design
- Consistent Camera Quality
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- 25W Charging (relatively slow)
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Bright Display
- Large Screen
- Competitive Price
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Oversaturated Camera Images
- Plastic Build
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant Super AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and immersive visuals. The M53 measures 802 nits max brightness, which is impressive. The A73's display is also bright and color-accurate. While both are excellent, the A73's slightly more refined color calibration gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems. The A73 5G typically delivers more consistent image quality across different lighting conditions, with better dynamic range and color accuracy. The M53's camera is capable, but can sometimes produce slightly oversaturated images. Video recording is comparable on both devices.
Performance
Here's where the A73 5G shines. The Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the M53. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A73. The M53 is still capable, but may struggle with more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The M53 takes the crown in battery life. Its endurance rating of 114h is exceptional, allowing for multiple days of use on a single charge. The A73 5G, while still offering good battery life, won't last quite as long.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M53 is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a large, bright display on a budget. The Galaxy A73 5G is better suited for those who value performance, a more premium design, and a more consistent software experience, even if it means sacrificing some battery longevity.