Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Galaxy A33 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M53 edges out the A33 5G thanks to its brighter display and slightly better battery endurance. While both offer solid performance, the M53's Dimensity 900 chipset provides a marginal advantage. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities and budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M53 | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | € 249.98 | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9) GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter Display (802 nits)
- Longer Battery Life (114h Endurance)
- Potentially better performance (Dimensity 900)
- Larger Screen
- Potentially less software support than A series
- Larger and heavier design
- 25W charging is relatively slow
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- More compact design
- Potentially better software update support
- Efficient Exynos 1280 chipset
- Good value for money
- Less bright display (728 nits)
- Shorter battery life (104h Endurance)
- Slightly lower performance than M53
Display Comparison
The M53 boasts a significantly brighter display at 802 nits compared to the A33 5G's 728 nits. Both feature a nominal infinite contrast ratio and a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and visuals. The M53's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature versatile camera setups, but the specifics of the sensors and image processing differ. The M53 is expected to have a higher resolution main sensor (likely 108MP vs A33's 48MP), potentially capturing more detail. Both offer video recording capabilities, but quality and features may vary. Detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing.
Performance
Both phones utilize an Octa-core CPU with the same core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). However, the M53's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset generally offers slightly better performance than the A33 5G's Exynos 1280, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. Real-world performance differences are likely to be subtle for most users.
Battery Life
The Galaxy M53 takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the A33 5G's 104 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage times on a single charge for the M53.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M53 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display for media consumption and extended battery life. The Galaxy A33 5G is a great choice for those seeking a more compact design, potentially better software support, and a slightly more efficient chipset.