Samsung Galaxy M53 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the better choice. While the Samsung Galaxy M53 boasts a slightly older, potentially faster CPU, the Nord CE 3 Lite’s dramatically faster 67W charging and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset provide a more practical and user-friendly experience, especially for daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M53 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | € 249.98 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 900
- Excellent battery endurance (114h rating)
- Bright display (802 nits)
- Slower 25W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Limited camera details available
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (80% in 30 min)
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely better thermal management
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M53 features an 802 nits max brightness display, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. However, the Nord CE 3 Lite’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given the M53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (likely a marketing term for a high contrast AMOLED panel), it likely offers vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices is a notable omission; however, the M53’s brightness advantage suggests a better viewing experience in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size or megapixel counts, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is a standout in the camera department. The usefulness of any included macro cameras (often 2MP) is questionable, prioritizing marketing over image quality. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Samsung typically favoring vibrant, saturated colors and OnePlus aiming for a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy M53 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm), featuring a dual-cluster configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests stronger peak performance compared to the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), which employs 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. However, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficiency and optimized power management. While the M53 might win in benchmarks, the Nord CE 3 Lite is likely to offer a smoother, more consistent experience during prolonged use due to better thermal throttling control.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy M53 boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite compensates for potentially smaller battery capacity with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the M53’s 25W charging. While the M53 offers longer runtimes on a single charge, the Nord CE 3 Lite’s rapid charging minimizes downtime, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M53 if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and are willing to accept slower charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value fast charging, all-day battery life, and a smoother, more efficient user experience for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and casual gaming.