Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs M54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M54 edges out the M52 5G thanks to its newer, more efficient chipset and generally improved performance. While the M52 5G boasts a higher endurance rating, the M54's overall package makes it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G | Samsung Galaxy M54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 24 | 2023, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) | 164.9 x 77.3 x 8.4 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Dark Blue, Silver |
| Models | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS | SM-M546B, SM-M546B/DS |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -30.0 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Very bright display
- Excellent endurance rating
- Good performance for the price
- Older chipset
- Potentially less refined camera
- Slightly bulkier design
Samsung Galaxy M54
- Newer, more efficient chipset
- Improved performance
- Likely better camera
- Modern design
- Slightly shorter battery life (potentially)
- 25W charging (slow)
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The M52 5G features a vibrant 777 nits max brightness display with an infinite contrast ratio, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The M54 likely has a similar quality AMOLED display, though brightness measurements are not available. Both offer a smooth 120Hz refresh rate for fluid scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature capable camera systems, the M54 is expected to have improvements in image processing and low-light performance due to its newer chipset and potentially updated camera sensors. Specific camera specs are not fully detailed, but the M54 likely offers a more versatile camera setup. Both phones are expected to offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The M54's Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset represents a significant upgrade over the M52 5G's Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The Exynos 1380 offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The M52 5G is still capable, but the M54 provides a noticeably snappier experience.
Battery Life
The M52 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h. The M54, while having a similar battery capacity (likely around 6000mAh), may see slightly reduced endurance due to the more power-hungry Exynos 1380 chipset, but the difference should be minimal.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is a good option for users prioritizing a bright display and a slightly longer battery endurance (though the difference is minimal). The Samsung Galaxy M54 is ideal for those seeking smoother performance, a more modern chipset, and a generally more refined experience.