Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs M53: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The M52 5G edges out the M53 thanks to its Snapdragon 778G chipset, offering smoother performance and better gaming. While the M53 boasts a slightly brighter display, the M52 5G's overall package provides a more refined experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G | Samsung Galaxy M53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 24 | 2022, April 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Models | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 249.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.31 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -30.0 LUFS (Average) | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Sleek Design
- Good Value
- 25W Charging is Slow
- Camera slightly less vibrant than M53
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter Display (802 nits)
- Vibrant Camera Output
- Modern Design
- Weaker Performance (Dimensity 900)
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life (114h Endurance)
- 25W Charging is Slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and immersive visuals. The M53 has a measured peak brightness of 802 nits, slightly exceeding the M52 5G's 777 nits. However, the difference is subtle and unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. Both have excellent contrast ratios.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but the M53 generally produces slightly more vibrant and detailed photos, particularly in well-lit conditions. The M52 5G's camera is still very capable, but the M53's image processing tends to be more aggressive. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
Here's where the M52 5G takes a clear lead. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is generally considered more powerful and efficient than the MediaTek Dimensity 900 in the M53. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the M52 5G. The M53's CPU configuration, while having more cores, doesn't compensate for the chipset's overall weaker performance.
Battery Life
The M52 5G holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 123h compared to the M53's 114h. While the difference isn't massive, it suggests the M52 5G's chipset is more power-efficient. Both phones support 25W wired charging, which is relatively slow by modern standards.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a well-rounded experience, especially those who enjoy mobile gaming. The Samsung Galaxy M53 is a good choice for those who value a brighter display and a slightly more modern design, and are less concerned about raw processing power.