Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Galaxy M51: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M52 5G boasts a brighter display and a more modern 5G chipset, offering improved performance. However, the M51 still holds its own with significantly longer battery life and reverse wired charging. Ultimately, the M52 5G is for those prioritizing speed and 5G, while the M51 is for battery champions.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G | Samsung Galaxy M51 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 24 | 2020, August 31. Released 2020, September 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired, 100% in 115 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 7000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White |
| Models | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS | SM-M515F, SM-M515F/DSN |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.38 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 156h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -30.0 LUFS (Average) | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 266620 (v8) GeekBench: 1774 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Brighter Display
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
- 5G Connectivity
- Modern Chipset
- Shorter Battery Life
- No Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Higher Price
Samsung Galaxy M51
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Generally More Affordable
- Large Display
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 730G)
- Lower Brightness Display
- Slower Performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G takes the lead in display brightness, measuring 777 nits compared to the M51's 677 nits. Both feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term), but the M52 5G's higher brightness makes it more visible in sunlight. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The M52 5G likely benefits from newer image processing algorithms thanks to its newer chipset. Expect similar overall image quality in good lighting conditions, but the M52 5G might have an edge in low-light scenarios. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The M52 5G's Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is a significant upgrade over the M51's Snapdragon 730G. The 778G offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming. The 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency. While the M51 is still capable, the M52 5G provides a noticeably faster experience.
Battery Life
The Galaxy M51 is the clear winner in battery life. It boasts an endurance rating of 156 hours, significantly higher than the M52 5G's 123 hours. The M51 also includes reverse wired charging, allowing you to charge other devices using your phone's battery – a feature absent in the M52 5G.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G? Users seeking a smoother experience with 5G connectivity and a brighter display for media consumption. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy M51? Those prioritizing maximum battery life and the convenience of reverse wired charging, even if it means sacrificing some performance.