Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Galaxy A52: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M52 5G edges out the A52 thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset and 5G connectivity. While the A52 boasts a slightly brighter display, the M52's performance advantage makes it the better overall choice for most users seeking a smooth, future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 24 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS |
| Price | About 300 EUR | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 |
| SAR EU | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -30.0 LUFS (Average) | -27.0 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 261282 (v8) GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- 5G Connectivity
- Longer Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Modern Chipset (6nm)
- Potentially less established software support compared to A52
- Design might be less premium than A52
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Slightly Brighter Display (794 nits)
- More Established Device (longer software support history)
- Good Value for Money
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 720G)
- Shorter Battery Life (105h Endurance)
- No 5G Connectivity
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant Super AMOLED displays with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and animations. The Galaxy A52 measures a peak brightness of 794 nits, slightly exceeding the M52 5G's 777 nits. However, the difference is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. Both have excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal).
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, typically including a main lens, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. While specific megapixel counts may vary, image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is decent on both, but the M52 5G's more powerful processor may allow for slightly better image processing. Video recording capabilities are similar, supporting up to 4K resolution.
Performance
This is where the M52 5G truly shines. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is considerably more powerful than the A52's Snapdragon 720G. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the M52 5G. The M52 5G's 6nm process also contributes to improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The Galaxy M52 5G holds a clear advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 123 hours compared to the A52's 105 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage times between charges. The A52 does offer 25W wired charging with a 50% charge in 30 minutes, while the M52 5G also has 25W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, and a smoother overall experience. The Galaxy A52 is a good option for those who value a slightly brighter display and a more established, reliable device, especially if 5G isn't a necessity.