Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A34 edges out the M52 5G thanks to its brighter display, slightly better battery life, and more modern design. While the M52 5G has a capable chipset, the A34's overall package makes it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 24 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -30.0 LUFS (Average) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 504424 (v9) GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- Potentially slightly more powerful chipset
- Good value for the price
- 5G connectivity
- Lower display brightness
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Older design
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter display
- Longer battery life
- More modern design
- Likely better camera software
- Charging speed could be faster
- Performance is comparable to M52 5G
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A34 boasts a significantly brighter display at 1009 nits compared to the M52 5G's 777 nits. This difference is noticeable in outdoor use and under bright lighting conditions. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite, nominal), providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The A34 also likely has a more modern display panel (likely AMOLED vs LCD on the M52 5G, though this isn't explicitly stated).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the A34 is expected to have a more refined camera software and potentially better image processing due to Samsung's ongoing improvements. Both likely offer good image quality in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance will be a key differentiator.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G 5G in the M52 5G is a capable chipset, offering smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The Dimensity 1080 in the A34 provides comparable performance, with a slight edge in CPU power due to its Cortex-A78 core configuration. Both phones handle multitasking well, but the A34's newer architecture might offer slightly better efficiency.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34 takes the lead in battery life with an endurance rating of 133h, slightly surpassing the M52 5G's 123h. Both phones support 25W wired charging, which is relatively slow compared to some competitors. However, the A34's slightly larger battery capacity contributes to its longer endurance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G? Users prioritizing a slightly more powerful chipset for demanding games or apps might consider the M52 5G. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A34? Those seeking a brighter screen, longer battery life, and a more contemporary design will find the A34 a better fit.