Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?

The Samsung Galaxy M33 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The M33 leverages Samsung’s in-house Exynos 1280, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing fast charging and consistent performance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the M33’s 25W, and the Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, offers a more efficient experience despite the Exynos 1280’s slightly higher clock speeds.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy M33 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, March 042022, January 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, April 08Available. Released 2022, February 18
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (Global) / 215 g (India) (6.98 oz)202 g (7.13 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G68Adreno 619
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8Android 11, MIUI 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple-108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioUnspecifiedUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyroFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 Virtual Proximity SensingVirtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging25W wired 4.5W reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min
TypeMarket-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only)Li-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGreen, Blue, BrownGraphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue
ModelsSM-M336B, SM-M336B/DS, SM-M336BU, SM-M336BU/DS, SM-M336K21091116I, 2201116SG
Price£ 299.00€ 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00
SAR-1.05 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU1.04 W/kg (head)     1.38 W/kg (body)0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 115h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.8 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Samsung Galaxy M33

  • Potentially higher peak CPU performance for demanding tasks.
  • Samsung’s One UI offers a feature-rich software experience.
  • Reverse wireless charging capability.

  • Significantly slower 25W charging.
  • Exynos 1280 may be prone to thermal throttling.
  • Limited display brightness information.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

  • 67W fast charging for rapid power-ups.
  • More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset.
  • Higher peak display brightness for outdoor visibility.

  • CPU clock speeds are slightly lower than the Exynos 1280.
  • Xiaomi’s MIUI can be bloated with pre-installed apps.
  • Camera processing may be overly saturated for some users.

Display Comparison

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, a significant advantage over the Galaxy M33 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio claim for the Redmi, the higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of information regarding the M33’s panel technology and refresh rate makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Redmi’s brightness is a clear win for outdoor usability.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both will rely heavily on software processing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s image processing is generally known for vibrant colors, while Samsung typically aims for more natural tones. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on electronic stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy M33’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) employs 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Exynos has a slightly higher peak clock speed, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm fabrication process provides superior power efficiency. This means the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load, offering more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions. The 6nm process also contributes to better battery life.

Battery Life

Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Galaxy M33’s 25W charging is significantly slower, making the Redmi a far more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The 4.5W reverse wired charging on the M33 is a niche feature, useful for charging accessories but not a primary selling point.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy M33 if you prioritize a potentially smoother experience in graphically intensive tasks due to the Cortex-A78 cores in the Exynos 1280, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, all-day battery life, and a more thermally efficient chipset for sustained performance during gaming and everyday use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy M33 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280, while capable, is built on a 5nm process which can lead to thermal throttling under sustained load. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process, is likely to maintain more consistent performance during extended gaming.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range offer limited detail and image quality. They are often included for marketing purposes but rarely deliver truly impressive macro photography. Expect soft images and limited dynamic range.
❓ Can the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G maintain a stable 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at 60fps, but you may need to lower the graphics settings to 'Smooth' or 'Balanced' to maintain a consistently stable frame rate. The 6nm process helps mitigate throttling, but it's not a flagship-level chipset.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use between the two phones?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. A quick 15-minute charge can provide a significant boost, making it ideal for users who often find themselves with low battery and limited time. The Galaxy M33’s 25W charging requires considerably longer to achieve a full charge.