Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?

The Samsung Galaxy M33 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The M33 leverages Samsung’s in-house Exynos 1280, while the Poco X4 Pro opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695 5G. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing fast charging and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the M33’s 25W, and the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process offers better efficiency, despite the Exynos 1280’s slightly higher clock speeds.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy M33 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2022, March 042022, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, April 08Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (Global) / 215 g (India) (6.98 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G68Adreno 619
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple-108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyroFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 Virtual Proximity Sensing-
Battery
Charging25W wired 4.5W reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min
TypeMarket-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only)Li-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGreen, Blue, BrownLaser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow
ModelsSM-M336B, SM-M336B/DS, SM-M336BU, SM-M336BU/DS, SM-M336K2201116PG
Price£ 299.00€ 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940
SAR-1.06 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU1.04 W/kg (head)     1.38 W/kg (body)0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.8 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Samsung Galaxy M33

  • Samsung Ecosystem Integration
  • Potentially longer software support
  • Higher CPU clock speeds (on paper)

  • Slower 25W charging
  • Less efficient 5nm Exynos 1280
  • Limited information on display specs

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

  • 67W fast charging with PD3.0/QC3
  • More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695
  • Potentially better thermal management

  • Xiaomi’s software experience can be divisive
  • Camera image processing may not appeal to all

Display Comparison

Both devices share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating a high-quality panel. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both utilize AMOLED panels. The lack of high refresh rate information is a drawback for both, potentially limiting smoothness in scrolling and gaming. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. Without further data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner; the display experience will likely be similar.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both include a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. However, the prevalence of low-quality 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests their utility is limited. Image processing styles will likely differ – Samsung typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. Without sample images and detailed sensor specs, a definitive camera winner cannot be determined.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy M33’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (2.4 GHz Cortex-A78) compared to the Poco X4 Pro’s Snapdragon 695 5G (2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold). However, the Snapdragon 695 is fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. While the Exynos 1280 may win in short burst benchmarks, the 6nm Snapdragon is likely to exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco X4 Pro’s efficiency benefits users who frequently engage in mobile gaming or other demanding tasks.

Battery Life

Both the Samsung Galaxy M33 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro’s 67W wired charging, with support for PD3.0 and QC3, is a significant advantage, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The M33’s 25W charging is considerably slower. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The 4.5W reverse wired charging on the M33 is a niche feature, useful for charging accessories, but doesn’t significantly impact the overall battery experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy M33 if you prioritize the Samsung ecosystem and potentially benefit from future software updates, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, a more efficient chipset for prolonged gaming, and a generally more aggressive price point. The Poco X4 Pro is the better choice for power users and gamers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy M33 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1280 is a capable chip, its 5nm fabrication process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process. This means the M33 is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced performance over time. The Poco X4 Pro is expected to maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras found in this price range offer limited image quality. They often lack the detail and clarity needed for truly impressive close-up shots. They are primarily included as a feature to broaden the camera specifications, but shouldn't be a primary consideration when choosing between these phones.
❓ Can the Poco X4 Pro 5G fully charge from 0% to 100% in under an hour?
Yes, the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W fast charging and is advertised to reach 100% charge in approximately 41 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Galaxy M33’s slower 25W charging.
❓ Which phone is better suited for running demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is better suited for demanding games like PUBG Mobile. The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process and improved thermal management will allow for higher sustained frame rates and less throttling compared to the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy M33.