Samsung Galaxy M33 vs M53: Which Mid-Range Galaxy Should You Choose?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M53 generally edges out the M33 thanks to its brighter display and potentially better camera performance. However, the M33 might offer slightly better value depending on pricing and specific features you prioritize. Both offer solid battery life and reliable performance for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M33 | Samsung Galaxy M53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2022, April 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (Global) / 215 g (India) (6.98 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only) | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue, Brown | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Models | SM-M336B, SM-M336B/DS, SM-M336BU, SM-M336BU/DS, SM-M336K | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN |
| Price | £ 299.00 | € 249.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.31 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
Samsung Galaxy M33
- More affordable
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly more compact design
- Good battery life
- Less bright display
- Potentially less powerful camera
- Exynos chipset may be slightly less efficient
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter display
- Potentially better camera
- Dimensity 900 chipset (slightly better GPU)
- Excellent battery life
- More expensive
- Larger size
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The M53 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 802 nits, offering better visibility outdoors. While the M33's display is perfectly adequate, the M53's contrast ratio (nominally infinite) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors. Both feature FHD+ resolution, but the M53's brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the M53 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. Details are missing, but the M53 often features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially improved image processing. The M33's camera is still capable, but the M53 likely provides better image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
Both phones share the same CPU (Octa-core 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), but the M53 utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset, while the M33 uses the Exynos 1280. The Dimensity 900 generally offers slightly better GPU performance, potentially leading to smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. However, day-to-day performance will likely feel similar on both.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Charging speeds are identical at 25W wired, with 4.5W reverse wired charging on the M33. Expect all-day battery life from either device.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M33 is ideal for users seeking a balance of features and affordability, particularly those who value a slightly more compact design. The Galaxy M53 is a better choice for those prioritizing a vibrant display, potentially improved camera capabilities, and don't mind a slightly larger footprint.