Samsung Galaxy M32 vs. OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the Galaxy M32’s Helio G80. While the M32 offers a slightly lower entry price, the Nord CE 2 Lite’s faster 33W charging and 5G capabilities justify the small premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M32 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 21 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mm (Global) or 9.3 mm (India) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (Global) / 196 g (India) (6.35 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired (International) 15W wired (India) | 33W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Light Blue | Black Dusk, Blue Tide |
| Models | SM-M325FV, SM-M325FV/DS, SM-M325F/DS, SM-M325F | CPH2381, CPH2409 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | 0.64 W/kg (head) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M32
- Potentially lower price point
- Likely larger display size
- Samsung’s One UI software (preference-based)
- Less powerful Helio G80 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (especially in India)
- Less efficient 12nm process
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Faster 33W charging
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- OxygenOS software (preference-based)
- May have a smaller display
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed display specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing. The Galaxy M32’s larger size (assumed, based on typical M-series offerings) may be preferable for video watching. The Nord CE 2 Lite’s display quality will likely benefit from the more modern chipset’s image signal processor, potentially offering better color calibration. Bezels are expected to be similar, with neither phone aiming for flagship-level screen-to-body ratios.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 695’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Nord CE 2 Lite 5G will likely provide superior image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The M32 may rely on MediaTek’s ISP, which is generally less sophisticated. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M32’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, meaning sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a clear advantage over the Helio G80’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in gaming and app loading times. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations.
Battery Life
The Galaxy M32’s battery capacity is unknown, but typical M-series phones feature large batteries. The Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s battery capacity is also unknown. However, the Nord CE 2 Lite’s 33W charging is a major advantage over the Galaxy M32’s 25W (International) or 15W (India) charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M32 if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you prioritize a larger display for media consumption over raw performance. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G if you value 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more. Gamers and multitasking users will particularly benefit from the Nord CE 2 Lite’s superior chipset.