Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs. M32 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly faster performance, complemented by a brighter display and faster 25W charging. While the M32 5G offers a lower entry price, the A52s 5G provides a more refined and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M32 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 25 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 02 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Slate Black, Sky Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | SM-M326B, SM-M326B/DS | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 220 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.48 W/kg (head) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M32 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Generally higher price point
- May not offer expandable storage (depending on region)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Lower price point, making it more accessible
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Similar battery endurance to the A52s 5G
- Less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 720 chipset
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Likely dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness on the M32 5G. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the A52s 5G’s superior brightness makes a tangible difference in real-world usage. The panel technology isn't specified for either, but the A52s 5G's higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel capable of wider color gamuts and better HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A52s 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G chipset will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a common feature in the A-series but unconfirmed on the M32 5G – would further enhance image quality and video stabilization on the A52s 5G. We advise ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both devices, as their image quality is generally poor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the M32 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the M32 5G’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This architectural advantage, combined with the smaller 6nm process node, results in significantly faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during demanding tasks. The A52s 5G will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the A52s 5G’s more powerful processor. This indicates efficient power management on both sides. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the M32 5G’s 15W charging. This translates to considerably faster charging times – a full charge from 0-100% will be noticeably quicker on the A52s 5G, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G if you are on a strict budget and prioritize 5G connectivity above all else, accepting compromises in processing power and display quality. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging speeds, even if it means spending a bit more.