Samsung Galaxy M32 5G vs OnePlus Nord CE 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, coupled with 30W fast charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the Galaxy M32 5G’s Dimensity 720 and 15W charging. While battery endurance is identical, the faster charging significantly improves usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M32 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 25 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 02 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Slate Black, Sky Blue | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | SM-M326B, SM-M326B/DS | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.48 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.9 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9) GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M32 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 15W charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 720 chipset
- Limited display brightness information
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G chipset
- 30W fast charging (70% in 30 min)
- Brighter 607 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to M32 5G
- LCD display technology
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 607 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Galaxy M32 5G. This difference translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays are likely to utilize LCD technology given their price points, the Nord CE 5G’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' for the Nord CE 5G, a typical marketing term for LCDs, suggesting standard contrast levels. The M32 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles difficult.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 750G’s image signal processor (ISP) generally provides better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in low-light conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features with limited practical utility. Focusing on the main sensor performance is crucial, and the Snapdragon’s ISP gives the Nord CE 5G an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm), while the OnePlus Nord CE 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm). The Snapdragon 750G, built on a more efficient 8nm process, generally offers superior CPU and GPU performance. Its CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570 – provides a clock speed advantage over the M32 5G’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both phones are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 750G will exhibit less strain during demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G and OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an identical endurance rating of 117 hours. This suggests similar battery life in real-world usage, despite the lack of specific mAh capacity information for the M32 5G. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord CE 5G supports 30W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 30 minutes, while the M32 5G is limited to a slower 15W charging rate. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts the user experience, allowing the Nord CE 5G to quickly top up its battery when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and moderate 5G usage. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker 30W charging. It’s ideal for users who demand more from their smartphone throughout the day.