Samsung Galaxy M23 vs Oppo Reno7 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Oppo Reno7 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its 65W charging, capable of a full charge in just 31 minutes, and 635 nits peak brightness offer tangible benefits over the M23's 25W charging and unspecified display brightness. However, the M23 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M23 | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 08 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Green, Light Blue, Orange Copper | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | SM-M236B, SM-M236B/DS, SM-M236L | CPH2371 |
| Price | £ 195.34 | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR EU | 0.78 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy M23
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 750G performance for everyday tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Dimensity 900
- Display brightness likely lower than Reno7 5G
Oppo Reno7 5G
- 65W SuperVOOC charging (31 minutes to 100%)
- Brighter 635 nit display
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer significantly better camera performance
- Software experience can be polarizing (ColorOS)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to the Samsung Galaxy M23’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays are likely to utilize LCD technology given their price points, the Reno7’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Reno7, suggesting a good level of black reproduction, though this is typical marketing language. The M23’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison difficult beyond brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor sizes, apertures, or image stabilization (OIS), a definitive camera comparison is challenging. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Given the market segment, image processing will likely prioritize vibrant colors and boosted contrast. The absence of detailed specs suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography compared to flagship devices.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy M23 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm), while the Oppo Reno7 5G features the MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm). The Dimensity 900, built on a smaller 6nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and slightly improved CPU performance, with its Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz versus the M23’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences favor the Dimensity 900 in sustained workloads. The 6nm node also suggests potentially better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, real-world performance differences may be subtle for typical usage.
Battery Life
Both the Samsung Galaxy M23 and Oppo Reno7 5G achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The M23 supports 25W wired charging, while the Reno7 5G boasts a significantly faster 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 31 minutes. The Reno7 5G also includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the M23. This charging speed difference is a major advantage for the Reno7 5G, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M23 if you need a reliable 5G phone with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize value for money. It's ideal for users who don't heavily rely on fast charging or demanding mobile games. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prefer a faster charging experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a chipset (Dimensity 900) that offers a slight edge in processing power for multitasking and gaming.