Samsung Galaxy M22 vs M23: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M23 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 750G chipset, 5G connectivity, and improved efficiency. While the M22 is a decent option, the M23's upgrades make it a worthwhile investment for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M22 | Samsung Galaxy M23 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 14 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 13 | Available. Released 2022, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 74 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (HDR) | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Light Blue | Deep Green, Light Blue, Orange Copper |
| Models | SM-M225FV, SM-M225FV/DS | SM-M236B, SM-M236B/DS, SM-M236L |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 195.34 |
| SAR EU | 0.62 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) | 0.78 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M22
- Large Super AMOLED display
- 90Hz refresh rate
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Outdated chipset
- Slower performance
- No 5G
- Less refined camera
Samsung Galaxy M23
- Faster Snapdragon 750G chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Improved camera performance
- Better efficiency
- Modern design
- Slightly higher price
- No significant display upgrade over M22
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The M23 might have slightly better brightness, but the difference is minimal. Both offer a good viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The M23 generally offers better camera performance. While both have a 50MP main sensor, the Snapdragon's image processing is superior. The M23 also often includes improved low-light performance and video stabilization. The M22's camera is adequate but lacks the refinement of the M23.
Performance
This is where the M23 shines. The Snapdragon 750G is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G80. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the M23. The M22 can feel sluggish at times, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. However, the M23's more efficient Snapdragon chipset allows it to stretch that battery life further, especially with 5G usage.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy M22? Those on a very tight budget who prioritize a large display and don't need 5G. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy M23? Anyone seeking a smoother, faster experience with 5G capabilities and a more modern chipset, even at a slightly higher price point.