Samsung's budget phone lineup is always a hot topic, offering incredible value for money. The Galaxy M14 and A14 are two contenders vying for your attention. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M14 edges out the A14 thanks to its significantly faster Exynos 1330 chipset and potentially faster charging (depending on region). While the A14 offers a more streamlined design, the M14's performance advantage makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 08 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.2 x 9.4 mm (6.57 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, One UI core 5.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired - international
25W wired - India | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | SM-M146B, SM-M146B/DS, SM-M146B/DSN | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | ₹ 10,990 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | 0.48 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M14
- Faster Processor (Exynos 1330)
- Potentially Faster Charging (25W in India)
- Larger Battery Capacity (6000mAh expected)
- Better Gaming Performance
- Potentially bulkier design
- May lack some premium features
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More Compact Design
- Potentially Lower Price
- Decent Camera Performance
- Slower Processor (Helio G80/Exynos 850)
- Shorter Battery Life
- Less Powerful for Gaming
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display, likely with a 90Hz refresh rate. However, the M14 might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its more modern chipset. Expect similar viewing experiences overall, suitable for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup, with a primary sensor around 50MP. The M14's more powerful processor should allow for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Expect similar camera quality in well-lit conditions, but the M14 may have a slight edge in dynamic range and detail.
Performance
This is where the M14 shines. The Exynos 1330 (5nm) is considerably more powerful than the Helio G80 (12nm) or Exynos 850 (8nm) found in the A14. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the M14. The A14 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Galaxy M14 is expected to have a larger battery capacity (likely 6000mAh) compared to the A14 (around 5000mAh). Combined with the more efficient Exynos 1330, this should translate to significantly longer battery life on the M14.
Buying Guide
The Galaxy M14 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and battery life, especially those who enjoy gaming or multitasking. The Galaxy A14 is a good fit for users who value a more compact design and a slightly more affordable price point, and are less demanding on performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy M14 worth the extra money?
If performance and battery life are your priorities, then yes. The M14's superior chipset and larger battery make it a worthwhile upgrade over the A14.
❓ Which Samsung Galaxy A14 version is better, the Helio G80 or Exynos 850?
The Exynos 850 version generally offers slightly better performance and efficiency than the Helio G80 version, but both are significantly slower than the M14's Exynos 1330.
