Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy M13: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset provides significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like Google’s computational photography. While the Galaxy M13 offers a lower price, the Pixel 7a’s overall experience justifies the cost for those prioritizing camera quality and responsiveness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M13 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 27 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 01 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Green, Orange Copper, Light Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | SM-M135F, SM-M135F/DSN | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | £ 139.99 / € 135.81 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR EU | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M13
- Significantly faster performance with the Tensor G2 chip
- Superior camera quality and computational photography
- Faster charging and wireless charging support
- Higher price point
- May not have expandable storage
Google Pixel 7a
- More affordable price
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption
- Likely has expandable storage via microSD card
- Slow performance with the Exynos 850 chip
- Inferior camera quality
- Slow charging speed
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the Galaxy M13’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels (given the price points), the Pixel 7a’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The M13’s display specifications are minimal, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity. We expect the Pixel 7a to offer superior color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality far beyond what the hardware alone suggests. The M13’s camera is likely a more standard affair, focusing on basic image capture. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities will also be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP). The M13’s 2MP macro camera is likely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit compared to the Pixel 7a’s more sophisticated image processing.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This is a massive upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy M13’s Exynos 850 (8nm) with its homogenous octa-core setup of 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 and another 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Tensor G2’s more advanced architecture and smaller fabrication node deliver significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, resulting in smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The M13 will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating good battery life despite not having a massive capacity. The Galaxy M13’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 15W charging is significantly slower than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support. The Pixel 7a also offers 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the M13. While the M13 might offer comparable or slightly longer screen-on time due to its less powerful processor, the Pixel 7a’s faster charging and wireless charging options provide greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M13 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You’ll appreciate its affordability and acceptable battery life. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google’s latest software features, even if it means spending more upfront.