Samsung Galaxy M13 5G vs Galaxy F23: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F23 edges out the M13 5G thanks to its superior Snapdragon 750G chipset, faster charging, and generally better performance. While the M13 5G is a decent option, the F23 provides a more polished and future-proof experience for a similar price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy M13 5G | Samsung Galaxy F23 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 14 | 2022, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 23 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Aqua Green, Stardust Brown | Aqua Blue, Forest Green |
| Models | SM-M136B, SM-M136B/DS | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 0.73 W/kg (head) | 1.24 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.84 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G
- Large 6.6-inch display
- Long battery life (6000mAh)
- Affordable price
- Expandable storage (microSD card slot)
- Slower processor (Dimensity 700)
- Slow charging (15W)
- Lower screen refresh rate (60Hz)
- Less powerful camera
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 750G)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Higher screen refresh rate (120Hz)
- Better camera performance
- More efficient 8nm process
- Slightly higher price
- No expandable storage (microSD card slot)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch display, but the F23 typically boasts a slightly higher refresh rate (120Hz vs 60Hz on the M13 5G), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The F23 also often has better color accuracy and brightness.
Camera Comparison
While both offer decent camera setups, the F23 generally has a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The F23's camera tends to perform better in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Snapdragon 750G in the F23 is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 700 in the M13 5G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the F23. The F23's 8nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones typically have a 6000mAh battery, offering excellent battery life. However, the F23's 25W fast charging is considerably faster than the M13 5G's 15W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G is a good choice for users prioritizing a larger screen and a slightly lower price point, and who aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is ideal for those seeking better performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming.