Samsung's budget phone lineup is constantly evolving, and the Galaxy M13 5G and F13 are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M13 5G edges out the F13 thanks to its 5G connectivity and significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset. While the F13 offers a slightly more efficient Exynos 850, the M13 5G's performance advantage makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 14 | 2022, June 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 23 | Available. Released 2022, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Aqua Green, Stardust Brown | Waterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky Green |
| Models | SM-M136B, SM-M136B/DS | SM-E135F, SM-E135F/DS |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.73 W/kg (head) | 0.55 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.84 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 700)
- Better Gaming Performance
- Slightly Better Display Calibration (Likely)
- Slightly Higher Price
- Charging Speed (15W)
Samsung Galaxy F13
- More Affordable
- Slightly Better Battery Efficiency
- Good Battery Life (6000mAh)
- Slower Processor (Exynos 850)
- Less Powerful for Gaming
- No 5G
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display, likely with a 90Hz refresh rate. While panel technology (LCD vs. AMOLED) isn't explicitly stated, expect similar visual quality. The M13 5G might offer slightly better color accuracy due to Samsung's typical display calibration, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a similar camera setup: a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. Image quality will be comparable in good lighting conditions. The M13 5G might have a slight edge in low-light performance due to the more powerful processor assisting with image processing.
Performance
This is where the M13 5G shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 is a considerably faster chipset than the Exynos 850. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the M13 5G. The Exynos 850 is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 6000mAh battery, promising excellent battery life. The Exynos 850 in the F13 is slightly more power-efficient, potentially giving it a marginal advantage in real-world usage, but both should easily last a full day.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity and a smoother overall experience, especially for gaming and multitasking. The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a good option for those prioritizing battery life and a slightly more affordable price point, and who don't heavily rely on demanding apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G worth the extra money?
Yes, if 5G connectivity and better performance are important to you. The Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable upgrade over the Exynos 850.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both offer excellent battery life, but the Galaxy F13's Exynos 850 is slightly more efficient, potentially extending battery life by a small margin.